Hi Brett, Thanks a lot for your help!!
Regards, Nitin Kapoor On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Brett Tate <[email protected]> wrote: > > is that 2~3 183 w/sdp is valid and call can be processed? > > Yes; it is valid. However, RFC 6337 recommends to not include the SDP. > > Maybe you will find the following snippet more clear concerning how the UAC > MUST handle SDP contained within the subsequent 18x/2xx responses. > > RFC 3261 section 13.2.1: > > "The UAC MUST treat the first session > description it receives as the answer, and MUST ignore any > session descriptions in subsequent responses to the initial > INVITE." > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
