Hi All,

Record route is normally added in Request.
I have encountered a weird case that INVITE from my sip device did not have
Record-Route, but the response of 180 and 200 have Record-Route. I could
not find if it is legit to add Record-Route in response from RFC 3261.



INVITE without Record-Route ------------------>
                                            <-----------------     183 with
Record-Route
                                            <-----------------     200 with
Record-Route

Please let me know if it is legit to add Record-Route in response?

Thanks in advance,


Frank
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to