Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see a problem here. We don't remove hook when chain is in use.
> However calling server means we'll have to call server one more time.
> That's on top of 5-6 calls already.
Avoiding server calls is good, but not if it leads to incorrect
seman
Tuesday, August 15, 2006, 3:21:51 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This patch deals with two sides of this problem. And actually saves
>> some time by not calling server one extra time.
> I don't think that's a good thing, now you risk calling a hook
Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch deals with two sides of this problem. And actually saves
> some time by not calling server one extra time.
I don't think that's a good thing, now you risk calling a hook that
has been deleted already. You really want to fetch the hook info