Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't see a problem here. We don't remove hook when chain is in use. > However calling server means we'll have to call server one more time. > That's on top of 5-6 calls already.
Avoiding server calls is good, but not if it leads to incorrect semantics. > But also the problem is passing information between threads here. We have > to continue with the hook chain, so we need to tell next thread at least > what hook is it (pass a handle?). Otherwise we won't know which one is > the next. But that gets us back to the same problem... Passing a handle is OK, it can be revalidated in the target thread. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
