2008/8/18 James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Juan Lang wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>>
RPC_FC_ERROR_STATUS_T has a value of 0x10 and therefore isn't a
possible value of "flags_type & 0xf" in the switch statement.
>>> This may be a really stupid question, but is it possible to generate
>
Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi James,
>
>
>>> RPC_FC_ERROR_STATUS_T has a value of 0x10 and therefore isn't a
>>> possible value of "flags_type & 0xf" in the switch statement.
>>>
>> This may be a really stupid question, but is it possible to generate
>> this condition?
>>
>
> No, it isn't po
Hi James,
>> RPC_FC_ERROR_STATUS_T has a value of 0x10 and therefore isn't a
>> possible value of "flags_type & 0xf" in the switch statement.
>
> This may be a really stupid question, but is it possible to generate
> this condition?
No, it isn't possible. 0xf & (any value) will never produce any
Rob Shearman wrote:
> RPC_FC_ERROR_STATUS_T has a value of 0x10 and therefore isn't a
> possible value of "flags_type & 0xf" in the switch statement.
>
Rob:
This may be a really stupid question, but is it possible to generate
this condition?
James McKenzie
