Juan Lang wrote: > Hi James, > > >>> RPC_FC_ERROR_STATUS_T has a value of 0x10 and therefore isn't a >>> possible value of "flags_type & 0xf" in the switch statement. >>> >> This may be a really stupid question, but is it possible to generate >> this condition? >> > > No, it isn't possible. 0xf & (any value) will never produce any value > larger than 0xf. 0x10 > 0xf. > Juan:
I meant is it possible to receive a RPC_FC_ERROR_STATUS_T (0x010) in the original data before it is anded with 0x0f. If this is possible, further changes may be needed. James McKenzie
