On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:07:29 +0200
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
> There's no win32 keyword ; only win16 and win64
>
> There wouldn't be any use anyway since it would be the default
>
I know; Ken pointed that out. I think I misread win16. Clearly I should not
post before having coffee.
--
Rosa
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> On 07/08/13 15:03, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>>
>> As to keyword usage, some of those bugs were tagged with the win64
>> keyword, some weren't. I know there is also a win32 keyword, and perhaps
>> that is meant to be used for the kind
+1 from me.
On 07/08/13 15:03, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:23:53 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
Would I be right in assuming you would like to see bugs in 32-bit
applications that are only present in a wow64 WINEPREFIX? Are there many?
Yes. As to how many there are, I've been abl
On 07/08/13 13:59, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
Can wow64 be added as a keyword to bugzilla? I know we already have win64 as a
keyword, but that's being used for both 64 bit apps and 32 bit apps in a 64 bit
wineprefix. I'm interested in being able to track the latter, as it's hitting
increasing nu
Can wow64 be added as a keyword to bugzilla? I know we already have win64 as a
keyword, but that's being used for both 64 bit apps and 32 bit apps in a 64 bit
wineprefix. I'm interested in being able to track the latter, as it's hitting
increasing numbers of users.
--
Rosanne DiMesio
