+1 from me.

On 07/08/13 15:03, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:23:53 +0100
Ken Sharp <kennyb...@o2.co.uk> wrote:


Would I be right in assuming you would like to see bugs in 32-bit
applications that are only present in a wow64 WINEPREFIX? Are there many?

Yes. As to how many there are, I've been able to find 7 by doing searches of summaries/comments for 
things like "wow64" and "64" and then reading the bugs to see if they fit, but 
since people have such wildly varying ways of phrasing things, I don't know if that's all of them. 
I have seen it often enough on the forum that I now routinely tell 64 bit users to try a 32 bit 
wineprefix and have added instructions on how to create one to the FAQ. That's why I'd like an 
easier way to track these bugs.

I see. A lot of people say this over and over again.

+1 from me for a wow64 keyword. They may even be fairly easy to solve (picking the right paths / registry entries).



As to keyword usage, some of those bugs were tagged with the win64 keyword, 
some weren't. I know there is also a win32 keyword, and perhaps that is meant 
to be used for the kinds of bugs I am looking for, but if so, that is not at 
all clear from the keyword definition, and it is not how people are using the 
keywords.


There's no win32 keyword?


Reply via email to