On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I tend to agree, this idea didn't really work out. Somehow
> different Win9x subversions have well recognised names like
> OSR2, SP1, SE but other Windows flavours do not while still
> having service packs of course. We could probab
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:56:51PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> We could easily chop those long tags to 6-7 chars. Shall we?
Yes, we should because ATM we don't control them, and we can
not allow unlimited strings in there. But 6-7 is a bit drastic.
Looking at current result, even 20 chars is st
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the email would be good, but not as the ID, the reports
> will be much uglified (the names are already a bit long
> right now).
We could easily chop those long tags to 6-7 chars. Shall we?
> we should have a -M switch that just appends metadata t
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> What's missing, what should be easier?
>
> Now that you're asking: in the reports, I don't quite like
> that a single report for Win95 is listed as OSR2 in the
> main summary [...]
this? Winetest able to handle an email address as the
username field?
Chris
>
> From: "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2004/06/03 Thu AM 01:30:05 EDT
> To: Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Request f
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 09:59:20AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think we should switch the winrash id field from the users first
> and last name to an email address we can contact the user at.
> There are a few odd errors that I'd like to get more information
> about but its difficult to
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> What's missing, what should be easier?
Now that you're asking: in the reports, I don't quite like
that a single report for Win95 is listed as OSR2 in the
main summary, but then it switches to Win95(n) when we have
more than one. Simi
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> work again. It would even make more sense now that the dust
> settled. Have you perhaps got concrete ideas?
So here is what's left to do:
1. Finish the metadata-in-winetest patch
2. Arrange the reports on WineHQ
3. Maybe add
Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the winetest results are sent back to winehq and can be
> accessed via http://test.winehq.org/data/ Pretty
> formatting of the results is coming soon ;-)
Do you mean somebody's already working on it or that I
should do it eventually? I'm back from the s
