"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> What's missing, what should be easier? > > Now that you're asking: in the reports, I don't quite like > that a single report for Win95 is listed as OSR2 in the > main summary [...]
I tend to agree, this idea didn't really work out. Somehow different Win9x subversions have well recognised names like OSR2, SP1, SE but other Windows flavours do not while still having service packs of course. We could probably drop this distinction altogether and empty this layer of abstraction. It would simplify things a bit. Deal? -- Feri.
