I think I will be able to do the changes next weekend.
If no one objects until Friday, I'll assume that everyone is fine
with the changes as proposed in this thread.
I'll furthermore assume that I can modify the descriptions of
categories as I see fit (I explained in a previous mail on this
topic
On Saturday 22 December 2007 19:54:17 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> --
> This is up for discussion:
[...]
> wine-net ->
I'll just go with James' suggestions here:
wine-net -> ws2_32, need to reclassify the wininet bugs to 'wininet', but that
can be done after the rename
vdm is a bit cryptic, could we call it win16 instead?
That's a bit broader, but that's ok.
The other products could use some attention, too.
Wine HQ Apps Database
website-bugs -> appdb-misc
WineHQ Bugzilla
bug list -> delete
comments -> delete
login -> delete
misc-bugs -> bugzilla-misc
WineHQ.c
On Dec 22, 2007 12:54 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok we talked and talked and talked and where did it all go? Where are the
> agreed upon changes?
>
> If we can't agree on everything, then lets do parts that everyone is ok
> with. Then decide on more changes.
>
>
> So far this
Ok we talked and talked and talked and where did it all go? Where are the
agreed upon changes?
If we can't agree on everything, then lets do parts that everyone is ok
with. Then decide on more changes.
So far this what everyone was happy with:
wine-misc -> unknown (default selection)
test ->
On Dec 17, 2007 12:51 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Users are not supposed to set a category the bug belongs to, this
> > > > requires
> > > > an investigation and knowledge of a developer. Personally I'd prefer to
> > > > have
> > > >
> > Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > >
> > > Users are not supposed to set a category the bug belongs to, this requires
> > > an investigation and knowledge of a developer. Personally I'd prefer to
> > > have
> > > "default" in the list instead of "wine-misc".
> > >
> > >
> > Better choice: Unknown or
On Dec 16, 2007 7:53 PM, James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: New bugzilla components.
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:52:40 -0700
> From: James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: D
Original Message
Subject:Re: New bugzilla components.
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:52:40 -0700
From: James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<
On Dec 16, 2007 4:08 PM, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 16 December 2007 22:47:23 James Hawkins wrote:
>
> > ws2_32 or wsock32, or both, depending on the existing bugs.
>
> Given that wsock32 forwards over 90% of the calls to ws2_32, let's go for that
> one then.
>
> > > Coming to
On Sunday 16 December 2007 22:47:23 James Hawkins wrote:
> ws2_32 or wsock32, or both, depending on the existing bugs.
Given that wsock32 forwards over 90% of the calls to ws2_32, let's go for that
one then.
> > Coming to think about that, if we're fine to add more categories for
> > things lik
On Dec 16, 2007 3:37 PM, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 16 December 2007 21:14:16 James Hawkins wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'll start off the list. This is a first draft, open to changes
> > and discussion. Entries with a (?) means I'm not sure.
> >
> > Components:
> [...]
> > wine-net ->
On Sunday 16 December 2007 21:14:16 James Hawkins wrote:
> Ok, I'll start off the list. This is a first draft, open to changes
> and discussion. Entries with a (?) means I'm not sure.
>
> Components:
[...]
> wine-net ->
If you delete that one, we definitely need a "winsock" component. Or ws2_32.
On Dec 16, 2007 6:20 AM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For me with this renaming is important that at least from the
> description it should then be absolutely clear what goes into a
> component and what not (for a developer).
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0700, Vitaliy M
Robert Shearman wrote:
> (For example, consult Jacek before creating separate mshtml, shdocvw and
> urlmon components.)
>
We currently have wine-shdocvw and wine-urlmon. That's fine for me and I
don't think we want to split shdocvw to mshtml and shdocvw. Although the
current name may be confus
On So, 2007-12-16 at 13:46 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unless we want to list most of the
> > subsystems in keywords, that span small parts of multiple dlls.
>
> In the vast majority of cases a bug belongs to a particular DLL, not
> a group
For me with this renaming is important that at least from the
description it should then be absolutely clear what goes into a
component and what not (for a developer).
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > What's happened to the proposal to remove the wine- prefix
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Rename wine-ole -> ole32
>
> Add oleaut32, rpcrt4
>
Currently, all of the above are filed in wine-ole and I don't have a
problem with that. Since a common question by our bugzilla advocates is
"does installing DCOM fix the bug?" then this makes sense.
Care needs to
On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:18:11 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Kai Blin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a category for secur32, called wine-sspi for now. As Microsoft
> > calls the whole GSSAPI clone implemented in secur32 and possibly
> > additional dlls SSPI, it makes sense to call the bu
"Kai Blin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a category for secur32, called wine-sspi for now. As Microsoft calls
> the whole GSSAPI clone implemented in secur32 and possibly additional dlls
> SSPI, it makes sense to call the bugzilla component that way.
sspi consists of at least a host and
"Kai Blin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an inherent advantage of splitting wine-net into wininet and winsock?
> (Apart from probably getting less .NET bugs filed in the category? ;) )
wininet and winsock are two absolutely different layers of very different
functionality.
> I'm not sure
On Sunday 16 December 2007 07:08:57 James Hawkins wrote:
> As Dmitry already said: ntdl, oleaut32, rpcrt4. Searching through
> bugzilla: wininet, wintrust, secur32, advpack, hhctrl, imagehlp,
> mshtml, shlwapi, urlmon. There are probably more, but that's a good
> starter list.
There's a category
On Sunday 16 December 2007 05:34:18 James Hawkins wrote:
> * Remove the following components:
> - wine-rebar
> - wine-gui
> - wine-multimedia
> - wine-net
> - wine-patches
> - test
>
> Any bug report listed under the components that are removed would have
> to be set to wine-misc and e
On Dec 15, 2007 11:27 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 2007 11:02 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> >>> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl ->
> >>> opengl32,
> >>> wine-use
"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If the component exists it should be named properly, i.e. represent the DLL
>> it belongs to in order to avoid a possible confusion.
>>
> That's the part I'd like to avoid. Unless we want to list most of the
> subsystems in keywords, that span sma
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl ->
>>> opengl32,
>>> wine-user -> user32
>>>
>> Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk
>> dll. Most of it's code somewhere els
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2007 11:02 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>>> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl -> opengl32,
>>> wine-user -> user32
>>>
>> Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk
"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl -> opengl32,
>> wine-user -> user32
>>
> Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk dll.
> Most of it's code somewhere else.
If the component exists it should
On Dec 15, 2007 11:02 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl -> opengl32,
> > wine-user -> user32
> >
> Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk dll.
> Most of it's code
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl -> opengl32,
> wine-user -> user32
>
Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk dll.
Most of it's code somewhere else.
> Add gdi32, ntdll, oleaut32, rpcrt4 and any other missing DLL
On Dec 15, 2007 10:45 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, can someone with sufficient privileges enact what was agreed upon
> > by the majority in this thread:
> >
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-October/059715.
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, can someone with sufficient privileges enact what was agreed upon
> by the majority in this thread:
>
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-October/059715.html
>
> To summarize:
>
> * Change all wine-X components to just X.
> * Remov
On Dec 15, 2007 10:19 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please add these new components:
> >
> > wine-vdm - Wine 16-bit compatibility layer
> > wine-comdlg - Common dialogs such as open/save/print/font
>
> (it either should be wi
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Please add these new components:
>>
>> wine-vdm - Wine 16-bit compatibility layer
>> wine-comdlg - Common dialogs such as open/save/print/font
>
> (it either should be wine-commdlg, or wine-comdlg32 IMO)
Doesn't matter t
"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please add these new components:
>
> wine-vdm - Wine 16-bit compatibility layer
> wine-comdlg - Common dialogs such as open/save/print/font
(it either should be wine-commdlg, or wine-comdlg32 IMO)
What's happened to the proposal to remove the wine
Please add these new components:
wine-vdm - Wine 16-bit compatibility layer
wine-comdlg - Common dialogs such as open/save/print/font
Vitaliy.
36 matches
Mail list logo
