"Kai Blin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an inherent advantage of splitting wine-net into wininet and winsock? > (Apart from probably getting less .NET bugs filed in the category? ;) )
wininet and winsock are two absolutely different layers of very different functionality. > I'm not sure if diversifying more than needed will actually help. The time > saved by not seeing e.g. wininet reports in the winsock category might be > spent reclassifying bugs to the appropriate category. Right now users can > just select "wine-net" if there's a problem with networking. Users are not supposed to set a category the bug belongs to, this requires an investigation and knowledge of a developer. Personally I'd prefer to have "default" in the list instead of "wine-misc". -- Dmitry.
