> I think that's a case where we could diverge from the PSDK (with a
> comment explaining why). Otherwise the header is completely useless: we
> could not even make sure its prototypes match those of our
> implementation.
Thanks Francois, I was hoping you'd check in.
> Btw, did you check this aga
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Juan Lang wrote:
[...]
> Should I leave the prototypes incorrect in wintrust.h to match the
> PSDK, or should I fix them to make them more convenient for me to use?
I think that's a case where we could diverge from the PSDK (with a
comment explaining why). Otherwise the heade
I'd say leave them wrong in our headers,
but report the problem to Microsoft,
and fix our headers when they fix theirs...
- Dan
Some of the function prototypes in wintrust.h have the wrong calling
convention. The trouble is, PSDK gets them wrong too. So calling the
functions, as declared in the PSDK header, results in a crash in
Windows. Casting them to function pointers with the correct calling
convention succeeds.
Sho
