> I think that's a case where we could diverge from the PSDK (with a > comment explaining why). Otherwise the header is completely useless: we > could not even make sure its prototypes match those of our > implementation.
Thanks Francois, I was hoping you'd check in. > Btw, did you check this against the very latest PSDK? Well, I checked against a PSDK I installed a month ago. If there's a newer one, I haven't checked it. > Could you provide the name of one of these functions? They're function pointers, actually. All the function pointer members of CRYPT_PROVIDER_FUNCTIONS in wintrust.h are declared without a calling convention. They need to be declared __stdcall. Is the default calling convention for VC++ __stdcall? If so, that'd explain the difference. Thanks, --Juan
