point number cannot require more precision than the original
> value.
>
> So I think you've essentially just rewritten modf. My understanding is
> that floating point equality comparisons are exact, except in weird
> cases like NaN.
Oh, thanks for your tips, I will look at it.
--
Regards,
Zhan Jianyu
And
equaty comparison could not avoid incurring
inaccuracy, which is not what I want .Dealing with the bit pattern may
looks odd, but it is correct.
--
Regards,
Zhan Jianyu
Sent from cell phone.
在 2013-4-21 上午1:30，"Vincent Povirk" 写道：
> Dealing with the bits of a floating point nu
comparision, to avoid comparision in every Case.
> Are you sure you want to return string type here? I'd expect a bool value
> (of type VT_BOOL) here...
>
> }
Oh, I'm misguided by the doc I referred to ... I will fix this.
--
Regards,
Zhan Jianyu
