On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > > I don't think converting to double is a good idea here. Why don't you do > conversions directly to BOOL for all cases? > My fisrt thought on this is to convert all type to double, and then at last I just do one-time comparision, to avoid comparision in every Case.
> Are you sure you want to return string type here? I'd expect a bool value > (of type VT_BOOL) here... > > } Oh, I'm misguided by the doc I referred to ... I will fix this. -- Regards, Zhan Jianyu
