2009/6/26 Vitaliy Margolen :
> Ken Sharp wrote:
>> Because the AppDB isn't supposed to be a forum.
> Who said that? It was _the_ only "official forum" long before
> forum.winehq.org came to be.
But now there *is* forum.winehq.org. AppDB isn't a forum (at least,
not any more).
>> I can see no usef
wrote:
Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less
outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed
all references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at
http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
The explanation is here:
http://wiki.winehq.org
Remco wrote:
I maintain two apps. I haven't updated their status in months. Yet,
I'm not removed. Apparently, this is because no other people added
something to these pages either.
The problem, as I see it, is with the job of maintainer. It's really
two jobs in one: you're a moderator of user
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
>
> Of course this guy agrees, he's been removed for being idle!
And when I did have the free time to submit, I had removed...
Who's loss is it?
Wine users!
Thanks to your rm -rf if they dont agree with me script :)
Cheers,
Tom
I maintain two apps. I haven't updated their status in months. Yet,
I'm not removed. Apparently, this is because no other people added
something to these pages either.
The problem, as I see it, is with the job of maintainer. It's really
two jobs in one: you're a moderator of user contributions, an
Austin English wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Vitaliy
Margolen wrote:
Ken Sharp wrote:
Because it's bloody obvious or THEY [comments] WOULDN'T BE REMOVED LONG BEFORE I
STARTED DOING IT.
I've never seen anything on wine-devel / wine-forum / winehq.org front page
/ wiki about removing
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Vitaliy
Margolen wrote:
> Ken Sharp wrote:
>> Because it's bloody obvious or THEY [comments] WOULDN'T BE REMOVED LONG
>> BEFORE I
>> STARTED DOING IT.
>
> I've never seen anything on wine-devel / wine-forum / winehq.org front page
> / wiki about removing old commen
Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Ken Sharp wrote:
>>> There were 300 comments, all removed.
>> Say what? I got only 9 messages of removed comments.
>
> That's because you still don't understand how the emails are sent. We
> went through this last time you had a rant and nobody
Tom Wickline wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
mailto:wine-de...@kievinfo.com>> wrote:
I'm still asking to remove Ken Sharp from AppDB admins. This behavior is
totally unacceptable. Removing user comments just because Ken
doesn't like
them is not a v
Ken Sharp wrote:
> Because it's bloody obvious or THEY [comments] WOULDN'T BE REMOVED LONG
> BEFORE I
> STARTED DOING IT.
I've never seen anything on wine-devel / wine-forum / winehq.org front page
/ wiki about removing old comments until one day I got 100 or so
notifications of comments removed
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wrote:
>
> I'm still asking to remove Ken Sharp from AppDB admins. This behavior is
> totally unacceptable. Removing user comments just because Ken doesn't like
> them is not a valid reason.
+1
mellery wrote:
> He has removed useful comments on apps I maintain too. I don't want to
> complain on the dev-list but if you know who i should email about it,
> I'd send an email.
This is the only place that you can/should discuss this.
Vitaliy
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Ken Sharp wrote:
There were 300 comments, all removed.
Say what? I got only 9 messages of removed comments.
That's because you still don't understand how the emails are sent. We
went through this last time you had a rant and nobody took any notice
because you're k
Ken Sharp wrote:
> Hardly, you spend most days arguing on Bugzilla, where comments can not
> be removed, so stop trying to play the victim.
I'm asking again, what are the basis to your removal of comments? Spec them
or you can not blame someone for not doing something that's not even written
down a
John Klehm wrote:
No doubt it's a good thing to keep the appdb information up to date
and clean out inactive accounts.
However it seems that if someone wants to do the work why should we
have a policy to prevent them from participating according to the time
their life allots? Last I checked w
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Ken Sharp wrote:
Because the AppDB isn't supposed to be a forum.
Who said that? It was _the_ only "official forum" long before
forum.winehq.org came to be.
I can see no useful reason for keeping old comments
I can name several reasons:
1. Apps that don't change much
Ken Sharp wrote:
> There were 300 comments, all removed.
Say what? I got only 9 messages of removed comments. Where are your 300? And
why did you remove all those comments??? Did you asked me or anyone is it ok
to remove them? Did you bother to discuss this with anyone?
I'm still asking to remove
No doubt it's a good thing to keep the appdb information up to date
and clean out inactive accounts.
However it seems that if someone wants to do the work why should we
have a policy to prevent them from participating according to the time
their life allots? Last I checked we werent over staffed
Ken Sharp wrote:
> Because the AppDB isn't supposed to be a forum.
Who said that? It was _the_ only "official forum" long before
forum.winehq.org came to be.
> I can see no useful reason for keeping old comments
I can name several reasons:
1. Apps that don't change much and old problems still exit
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Ken Sharp wrote:
Agreed, but in this case it is a moot point.
The particular application, Steam, often has test results waiting for >
8 days, so all FIFTEEN idle maintainers would have been removed long
before I had to do it manually, had the automatic deletion mechanis
Ken Sharp wrote:
> Agreed, but in this case it is a moot point.
> The particular application, Steam, often has test results waiting for >
> 8 days, so all FIFTEEN idle maintainers would have been removed long
> before I had to do it manually, had the automatic deletion mechanism
> been working.
Th
Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> Ricardo Filipe wrote:
>
>> on this particular case i feel ken and vitaly should have communicated
>> more to understand each others points of view and reach a consensus.
>> although i can totally see why ken decided to remove him from
>> maintainer this should not be done
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Erich Hoover wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Erich Hoover wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>> Maybe the memory is writable but not readable, and
>>> WSARecvFrom()/recv() is reading it while memcpy(
2009/6/26 Susan Cragin :
> Version 9 should be entirely deleted. That refers to the early 9.0 Preferred
> release, which is not available any more. 9.0 Preferred has been replaced by
> 9.5 Preferred, which is garbage like Standard. We should not have people
> buying DNS 9 Preferred and thinking it
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:56 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less
> outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all
> references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at
> http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
>
Greetings Jörg,
> Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less
> outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all
> references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at
> http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
>
> This is unappropriate censors
Am Thursday 25 June 2009 20:26:01 schrieb Tony Wasserka:
Watch out, some surfaces aren't lockable. I don't know the d3dx9 api too well,
but are you sure that you have a lockable surface here?
In some situations IDirect3DDevice9::UpdateSurface or
IDirect3DDevice9::StretchRect may be a faster way
Hi,
Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less outdated
than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all references to
Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
This is unappropriate censorship to me.
http://wiki.w
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Stefan
Leichter wrote:
> Am Thursday 25 June 2009 00:47:59 schrieb Austin English:
>> Makes IE6 installer a little happier
>
>
>> 0002-t2embed-add-stub-dll.txt
>> From 6b2a780718210b35cff17f519559a2c8faa80a07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Austin English
>> Date
> You sound like the troll to me.
Let's try to avoid name-calling, please. I know you weren't the first
to do so in this thread, but enough is enough. We try to be
relatively professional here.
Thanks,
--Juan
> And Ben Klein is not the VOICE of WineHQ!
>
> Tom
It doesn't matter who says something if what they are saying is correct.
You sound like the troll to me.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> This website is plagued by out of date and incorrect information. It
> is not endorsed, supported, or recommended by WineHQ (someone correct
> me if I'm wrong). Up-to-date information *should* be available on the
> AppDB.
Heh right I know, God fo
With regard to Dragon NaturallySpeaking, I have the following comments. Version 5 is still for sale, especially overseas, and is VERY cheap. It's ancient, and of poor quality, but someone still might want to use it. The only test is recent. I'd keep this as is. Version 7 ALL the comments are obsol
Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
Sjors Gielen wrote:
If you meant, why should they be deleted instead of kept for reference;
there could be an archive, but currently they are deleted, afaik.
Why don't you just save an outdated: true/false information? Those posts
could just be not displayed by defaul
Sjors Gielen wrote:
> If you meant, why should they be deleted instead of kept for reference;
> there could be an archive, but currently they are deleted, afaik.
Why don't you just save an outdated: true/false information? Those posts
could just be not displayed by default, but if someone ever nee
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2009/6/25 Ken Sharp :
>> To give a scale of the problem:
>> There are approx. 7700 program in the appdb.
>> There are approx 21,730 comments going back to 2004.
>> If it's not the maintainer's job to make sure the comments aren't tidied up,
>>
Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2009/6/25 Ken Sharp :
>> To give a scale of the problem:
>> There are approx. 7700 program in the appdb.
>> There are approx 21,730 comments going back to 2004.
>> If it's not the maintainer's job to make sure the comments aren't tidied up,
>> whose is it?
>>
>> I'm not the o
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2009/6/25 Ken Sharp :
To give a scale of the problem:
There are approx. 7700 program in the appdb.
There are approx 21,730 comments going back to 2004.
If it's not the maintainer's job to make sure the comments aren't tidied up,
whose is it?
I'm not the only admin cleanin
2009/6/25 Ken Sharp :
> To give a scale of the problem:
> There are approx. 7700 program in the appdb.
> There are approx 21,730 comments going back to 2004.
> If it's not the maintainer's job to make sure the comments aren't tidied up,
> whose is it?
>
> I'm not the only admin cleaning up comments
Ricardo Filipe wrote:
on this particular case i feel ken and vitaly should have communicated
more to understand each others points of view and reach a consensus.
although i can totally see why ken decided to remove him from maintainer
this should not be done lightly.
Ken asked Vitaliy to d
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
If there has been a recent discussion amongst the admins as to when it is appropriate to remove maintainers, I was left out of it. The only official policy I know of is tied to the failure to process test reports within a week, and the automatic mechanism for doing that i
2009/6/25 Rosanne DiMesio
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:41:39 +0100
> Ken Sharp wrote:
>
> > There were 300 comments, all removed. I asked you to do this, between
> > 15 maintainers, and you couldn't be bothered. That is why you were
> removed.
> >
> > Doing nothing is no help to anyone, as you hav
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:41:39 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
> There were 300 comments, all removed. I asked you to do this, between
> 15 maintainers, and you couldn't be bothered. That is why you were removed.
>
> Doing nothing is no help to anyone, as you have already been told, many
> times.
>
>
There were 300 comments, all removed. I asked you to do this, between
15 maintainers, and you couldn't be bothered. That is why you were removed.
Doing nothing is no help to anyone, as you have already been told, many
times.
Yet you're the only one complaining. Amazing.
Vitaliy Margolen w
Why did someone removed active maintainers from most active applications?
Do you guys even care who active who not? I was the only one doing
_anything_ on Steam AppDB entry. And I was removed by Ken Sharp because he
didn't like 9 "oldish" posts??? WTH?
This got to stop! If someone doesn't like ol
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
>
>
> This doesn't look like a correction to me.
>
Your post looks like a troll to me :)
Tom
2009/6/25 Tom Wickline :
> Everything in life becomes out of date after a little time passes by.
>
> Geez, I guess I should post about every little change that happens?
Yes, you should. Wine development releases are moving targets.
WineHQ's user support system should not have to deal with off-site
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Huw,
I'm having (and more systems according to test.winehq.org) intermittent
crashes in these mentioned tests.
It is happening in the while() loop in test_enum_fmtetc(), at
least for W2K and XP. I'm able to reproduce on W2K (once every 10 runs
or so) but I can't put my fi
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Davide Pizzetti wrote:
Here's the italian translation for winedbg
This is wrong of course - you broke English resource file.
You need to create a new file here with same naming convention
(rsrc_It.rc) and 'git add' it to your tree before commit.
And don't forget t
Davide Pizzetti wrote:
Here's the italian translation for winedbg
This is wrong of course - you broke English resource file.
You need to create a new file here with same naming convention
(rsrc_It.rc) and 'git add' it to your tree before commit.
"Vincent Povirk" writes:
> +HRESULT register_classes(void)
> +{
> +int i;
> +HKEY clsid_key, ips32_key;
> +LONG res=0;
> +HRESULT hr=S_OK;
> +static const WCHAR inprocserver32W[] =
> {'I','n','P','r','o','c','S','e','r','v','e','r','3','2',0};
> +
> +for (i=0; wic_classes
Davide Pizzetti wrote:
Here's the italian translation for cmdlgtst
- MENUITEM "Pa&ge Setup", CM_U_PAGESETUP
+ MENUITEM "Installazione Pa&gina", CM_U_PAGESETUP
}
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you treated this as
'installation page',
but it really means 'print page setup' - p
Am Thursday 25 June 2009 11:45:19 schrieb joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com:
> Stefan,
>
> >Generally, turning off GLSL turns down the advertised shader
> >model to 1.x, which is the d3d8 feature set.
>
> Is this still the case since your mail
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-June/0
Everything in life becomes out of date after a little time passes by.
Geez, I guess I should post about every little change that happens?
And Ben Klein is not the VOICE of WineHQ!
Tom
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/6/25 arcoun :
> > Hello,
> >
> > It is my understand
2009/6/25 arcoun :
> Hello,
>
> It is my understanding that IE7 installed in Wine (for exemple, by following
> instructions at
> http://www.wine-reviews.net/wine-reviews/applications/ie-7-on-linux-with-wine.html)
> has no support for ActiveX.
This website is plagued by out of date and incorrect in
Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Michael Stefaniuc :
>> Pierre Bourdon wrote:
>>> I think what Michael meant is that
>>> sprintf(a, "%s", b);
>>>
>>> is doing exactly the same thing as
>>> strcpy(a, b);
>> Right, that's what I meant.
>>
>>> in a less efficient way.
>> I'm not that much concerne
Matej Spindler wrote:
My first patch to wine. Am I doing this right?
Hi Matej,
Looks fine to me although I can't comment on the actual translations ;)
Thanks for helping Wine and looking forward to more translation pa
Hello,
I have been working in this area for the last several days.
It is actually greatly improving. I think the bulk of the remaining work
is in the wintrust area to correctly validate the downloaded cabinet
files. Then the prompting of the user to install these files.
With some of my pendi
Hello,
It is my understanding that IE7 installed in Wine (for exemple, by following
instructions at
http://www.wine-reviews.net/wine-reviews/applications/ie-7-on-linux-with-wine.html)
has no support for ActiveX.
Does anyone know what are the missing parts (in Wine or by adding more
native DLLs) t
Am Thursday 25 June 2009 00:47:59 schrieb Austin English:
> Makes IE6 installer a little happier
> 0002-t2embed-add-stub-dll.txt
> From 6b2a780718210b35cff17f519559a2c8faa80a07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Austin English
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:52:37 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] t2embed: add
60 matches
Mail list logo
