On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:34:58 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:30:59 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > On 16 November 2016 at 16:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 2016-11-16 17:16, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >>> noinst_PROGRAMS =
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:30:59 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 16 November 2016 at 16:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 2016-11-16 17:16, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >>> noinst_PROGRAMS = \
> >>> + $(built_test_programs) \
> >>>
Hi Jan,
On 16 November 2016 at 16:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 2016-11-16 17:16, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> noinst_PROGRAMS = \
>>> + $(built_test_programs) \
>>> + exec-fd-leak-checker\
>>> fixed-benc
On Wednesday 2016-11-16 17:16, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> noinst_PROGRAMS = \
>> + $(built_test_programs) \
>> + exec-fd-leak-checker\
>> fixed-benchmark
>>
>> check_LTLIBRARIES = libtest-runner.la
>
>Doesn't this
Hi Pekka,
On 16 November 2016 at 11:46, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Put also test programs into noinst_PROGRAMS so that they get always
> built. In check_PROGRAMS they are built for 'make check' but not for
> 'make'.
>
> This makes it harder to accidentally break the test programs.
>
> Signed-off-by:
From: Pekka Paalanen
Put also test programs into noinst_PROGRAMS so that they get always
built. In check_PROGRAMS they are built for 'make check' but not for
'make'.
This makes it harder to accidentally break the test programs.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
---
Makefile.am | 6 ++
1 file
