Hi
I am developing with Visual C++ Express 2008 on Windows. I needed to add some
Japanese characters to a source file, whereupon the editor stored the file in
UTF-16LE encoding. Subversion (1.6.12) now complains that the file has
inconsistent EOL-style.
Does Subversion 1.6 support UTF-16LE enc
ect: Re: UTF-16 files and inconsistent line endings
>
> On Thursday 14 October 2010, David Aldrich wrote:
> > I am developing with Visual C++ Express 2008 on Windows. I needed to add
> > some Japanese characters to a source file, whereupon the editor stored the
> > fil
Hi
I am running svn command line client 1.6.13 on Linux. Recently (possibly since
upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.6.13) I have found that whenever I run:
svn up
I am prompted for my password. I then choose to save it (unencrypted) but next
time around I am prompted for it again.
Any idea why this
Hi Nico
> Hard to tell. Did you compile it yourself, or are you using your
> distribution's Linux? And have you looked in .subversion for the
> authorization file with your password stored in it?
Thanks for referring me back to that area. I deleted the existing authorization
files and then foun
Hi
> In general, the protocol over which the connection is bundled is not a
> big performance limit. For moderately used repositories, complex
> post-commits doing silly things or doing checkouts to CIFS shares are
> such overwhelming performance hits that I've not noticed particular
> differences
Hi
With some trepidation ;-) I would like to ask for opinions, somewhat related to
this thread.
My understanding is that RHEL is intended for servers that must be rock solid
e.g. Web servers. In our organisation we run Centos 5 (essentially the same as
RHEL 5) on all our Linux development mac
> I doubt if there is a generic answer to that question, but with RHEL6
> recently released, maybe Centos6 will be released soon enough for your
> next upgrade and won't be outdated for a while. If you want the
> tradeoffs of faster update cycles, the main players are fedora and
> ubuntu where fed
Hi
We host each of our projects in a separate svn repo and control access
permissions via Apache.
In one large project, we need to limit the visibility of a few confidential
files. We have done this by specifying something like:
[myproj:/trunk/ConfidentialFolder]
@myPrivilegedGroup = rw
* =
problem?
David
-Original Message-
From: David Weintraub [mailto:qazw...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 December 2010 15:40
To: David Aldrich
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: An access permissions problem
It looks like the, branches, tags, and trunk directories are at the
root of your
Hi
I wonder if anyone would answer the following questions about svn:external for
me please?
1) Subversion allows you to commit a change within the directory that uses the
svn:external property. This change will not be committed to the referenced
(source) directory/repo. I can't imagine a circ
Hi Martin and Jan
> You mean: not to the repository, where the other repository is linked
> into via svn:external?
Sorry, I have misunderstood the manual. I thought that commits to a file in the
folder that has the svn:external property would not be reflected in the source
repo. This is not tru
Hi
I'd like to explain my high level problem, which I hoped externals would solve.
Maybe someone will have a suggestion how to properly address this.
Our source code is used by several developer groups. A few files need to be
confidential to one group. We can set access permissions on these fil
Hi Jan
> In the future hopefully an authz file with wildcards will solve the
> problem:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2662
>
> Right now I don't there's anything better than externals.
Thanks, I think that this is what we need. However, I can't see this on the
svn roadm
Hi Jan
> I've changed my mind, there is something that may be better than
> externals, although it requires a little trick.
> You should be able to create a commit hook that checks if the authz file
> reflects the restrictions you want on a specific folder
> (*/thesecretfolder/*) for the branch
>
Hi
We are developing a fairly large application that uses open source libraries.
We have one svn repo per application. Currently, the open source libraries are
all stored with the application. This is a bad idea because the working copy
and repo are now very large. Also, every branch gets a cop
Hi Bob
> Personally, hard drive space is cheap. I would rather have all the
> dependencies for each project in my working copy. Sure, store it once in the
> repository and use externals in your projects.
Thanks very much for your comments. I prefer your approach and have seriously
considered usi
Hi
We maintain a mirrored offsite svn repository for backup purposes. The svnsync
process is run every 15 mins by a cron job.
We have recently installed a post-revprop-change hook to allow users to change
a revision's log message. The hook copies the rev prop change to the mirror:
svnsync co
> Just ignore that particular error? When the cron eventually runs, it will see
> the new log message.
Of course, thanks.
David
Hi
I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing Subversion
1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows checkout.
Any news on this please?
Best regards
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 April 2011 11:13
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subversion.apache.org)
> Subject: Re: Subversion 1.6.17?
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Tscharner [mailto:andreas.tschar...@metromec.ch]
> Sent: 26 April 2011 12:17
> To: David Aldrich; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Subversion 1.6.17?
>
> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasi
> Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported.
> When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ...
Hi Johan
Thanks very much for doing this review.
Best regards
David
Hi
When trying to reintegrate a branch into the trunk of my working copy, svn
1.6.17 crashes. The log file reads:
Process info:
Cmd line: svn merge --reintegrate ^/branches/
Version: 1.6.17 (r1128011), compiled May 30 2011, 20:42:10
Platform: Windows OS version 6.1 build 7601 Service Pack 1
Hi Stefan
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 19 July 2011 12:54
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: merge --reintegrate crash
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Stefan Sperling
> Thanks for your reply. Yes, we do have path-based authz rules, but my
> account should have no restrictions on the repository in question. I
> will check...
I have checked. I have full access to the branch and trunk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 19 July 2011 13:31
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: merge --reintegrate crash
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:18:05PM +, David Aldrich wrote:
>
Hi
One of our remote svn users is getting the following error when he attempts to
checkout a repo from our svn server:
svn: REPORT of '/subversion//!svn/vcc/default': Could not read chunk
delimiter: Secure connection truncated ()
We know that our repo is in good order because checkouts on the
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 18 August 2011 12:12
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org'
> Subject: Re: Could not read chunk delimiter: Secure connection truncated
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011
Hi
I have been asked whether the use of a SQLite-backed database in the svn 1.7
client will increase the memory usage of the client significantly. We are
wondering whether the client has to load the entire database into memory.
Can anyone comment on this please?
Best regards
David
> > I have been asked whether the use of a SQLite-backed database in the
> > svn 1.7 client will increase the memory usage of the client
> > significantly. We are wondering whether the client has to load the entire
> database into memory.
> >
> >
> >
> > Can anyone comment on this please?
>
> I ju
Hi
We have a problem with svnsync. We run:
svnsync sync /svn/
periodically to backup our master repositories to an offsite server.
For one particular repository, this command fails to sync one particular
revision. We see:
Copied properties for revision 3125.
Transmitting file data ..
Co
Hi Daniel
Thanks for your reply. We will consider that possibility.
BR
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
> Sent: 26 September 2011 23:51
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svnsync fails to b
Hi
Whenever we merge to, or reintegrate from, our branches, one particular file is
always merged with the comment 'Modified (properties only)'. We seldom change
this file.
Is there anything I can do to stop this happening?
We are running svn 1.6.17.
Best regards
David
> If it is a file, you can AFAIK safely remove the mergeinfo property from the
> fileĀ .
Thanks, it is a file. I have removed the property in the trunk. I then merged
the trunk into my branch whereupon I got a conflict for that file. So I just
deleted the mergeinfo property in the branch, marke
Hi
I am trying to update a branch with changes from the trunk. I am getting tree
conflicts that I do not know how to resolve. Please will someone take a look at
my console output below and advise me what to do? (For the sake of security, I
have sanitised the folder names).
BR
David
C:\SVNPro
Hi Stefan
Thanks very much for your advice, I will take careful note of it.
> BTW, I'm curious why you're getting an svn:mergeinfo conflict.
> That should never happen if you follow best practices.
> Is this common in your environment? If so, it seems people must be doing
> something quite wrong,
Hi
We have just merged a branch into the trunk (reintegration), but have not
committed the merge because some files are marked as 'History scheduled with
commit'. We don't know what to do about these.
A new folder was added to the branch. That folder is marked 'Added' in the
merge, but the f
Hi
We are running svn client 1.6.9 on Windows and checking out a working copy to a
Samba network drive.
We find that one of the directories is checked out with incorrect case:
/TML
becomes:
/tml
The svn checkout commentary shows the correct case.
Please can anyone suggest how this could hap
Hi Andy
> Check your Samba config & make sure that "preserve case" is enabled.
> See http://marc.info/?l=samba&m=98863735916130&w=2
Thanks for your reply. We set the parameters as specified in your link and it
has fixed our problem. Slightly odd though, because, as far as we can tell,
those see
Hi
Using some network monitoring tools it seems that my Windows svn command line
client (v.1.6.9) is accessing our in-house svn server via our proxy server.
However, my local 'servers' file does not specify a proxy (all lines begin with
#). Is it possible that the client really is accessing the
Hi Stefan
> I've added a new section to the book explaining how to keep
> a branch alive after reintegration.
Thanks very much for adding this new section. This method may well be useful to
us. Currently, we are running svn client 1.6.9 against svn server 1.5.2. Will
this combination support t
You could try SmartSVN.
Hi
I have a question about externals. I tried the following scenario in my working
copy:
1) Add an external definition to directory A, specifying subdirectory B
2) Commit directory A
3) Update directory A
I then see A/B populated
Then:
4) Edit external definition to directory A, specifying su
______
From: David Aldrich [david.aldr...@eu.nec.com]
Sent: 11 March 2010 16:11
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy
Hi
I have a question about externals. I tried the following scenario in my working
copy:
1) Add an external definition to director
Hi Neels
Thanks very much for your answer. It clarified svn's behaviour with externals
for me.
With best regards
David
From: neels [nee...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 March 2010 14:08
To: David Aldrich
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unexp
Hi
Our svn config file contains the line:
*.v = svn:eol-style=native;svn:keywords=Date Author Id Revision HeadURL
This assumes that .v files are Verilog text files. However, one of our
developers has a third party encrypted .v file that he wants to add. The file
is binary because it is encryp
Hi Andy
Thanks for your quick reply.
> The later. Auto-props are applied when you run svn add, so after the
> developer has added his encrypted file, he can edit the properties &
> make them right.
Actually, my previous post was incorrect - the error occurs upon add not commit:
C:\>svn add myfi
I suggest you look at recent posts on the official TortoiseSVN users mailing
list.
us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
David
Hi
On our internal network svn clients can access our svn server directly but some
clients are accessing the svn server via our proxy server. We want to stop svn
clients going via the proxy for reasons of efficiency and reliability.
I think that in instances where the proxy is used, the proxy i
Hi
One of our users asked me a question this morning that revealed that I don't
fully understand revision numbering in svn. So I would like to ask for
explanation please.
With the trunk at revision n, he created a tag using svn copy -r HEAD. So I
guess the tag was at then at revision n+1.
H
Hi Giulio
> When you use the update command you simply bring down the changes done
> into that directory. If you specify a revision you bring down the changes
> upt to that revision.
Thanks. I think that is the crucial point, that the update works on the
directory in question. Tags had no change
Hi
One of our users tried to copy between repositories and got error:
"svn: Repository moved temporarily to 'https://[snip] please relocate"
We understand that such copying is disallowed, but please will someone explain
what "Repository moved temporarily" means in this context?
Is it possible
Hi Chris,
Yes we do go through a proxy, so maybe your explanation is correct.
I haven't tried running it twice in a row but, since it's an invalid command, I
am not sure that that would make much difference.
BR
David
Hi
I have just finished working on a branch and have performed a reintegrate merge
back into the trunk. I only worked on 4 files in the branch and I carefully
merged from trunk to branch several times (including immediately prior to the
reintegration).
The reintegration correctly identified th
Hi
Thanks for your replies.
Perhaps I should have been more careful in what I wrote. Svn branching is easy.
It is the results of merge tracking that can be confusing. It's good to hear
from Mark that this problem is being addressed. I think I shall wait until the
next release before recommendi
Hi Erik
> Merging was much cleaner when we were
> disciplined about always committing and merging from the top of a branch.
Yes, I am aware of that good practice and followed it but I still got the files
with modified properties. I have reverted them now but I guess the changed
property was mer
Hi
Please can anyone point me to an example of a svn pre-commit hook that prevents
commits to files that are members of an externals definition?
We want to allow such files to be committed only from within the external
directory, i.e. where they originate from.
Best regards
David
Hi Ryan and Daniel
> Right. I don't think the server would be able to tell that a commit came
> from a working copy that, on the client side, had been created by an
> externals definition. I think it all looks the same to the server so I
> don't think such a hook script can be implemented.
Thank
Hi
I would like to show log information for a branch, to show when the branch was
created and when merges from the trunk were committed to the branch.
I have successfully used this command:
C:\MyProj\branches>svn log --stop-on-copy TRY_7June2010
-
Hi Ryan and Erik
> "svn update" first.
That did it, thanks.
> log -rHEAD --stop-on-copy TRY_7June2010
That actually gave no entries.
Thanks for your help.
David
Hi
A colleague needs to modify (or create a new version) of a tag, so that he ends
up with a tag identical to the original except for a few source files that are
to be rolled back to previous versions.
I believe it's not possible to roll back the source files in the tag itself
because the tag
Hi
It has been suggested that I use peg revisions to solve this problem. However,
I don't understand peg revision syntax.
As a test, I created a new text file in the trunk called pegtest.txt and then
made changes to it:
r1855 commit pegtest.txt ver.1
r1856 commit pegtest.txt ver.2
r1857 com
changing the revision of one file in a branch, where
that revision has not existed in the branch before?
David
From: Erik Andersson [mailto:kir...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 August 2010 12:51
To: David Aldrich
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rolling back some components of a tag
Hi
I
Hi Erik
I have now read the cherrypicking section. I think the point to note is that
merge is to do with changes, e.g. merge in the changes made in r1823. I was
looking to bring a specific version of a file. So, with merge, I would need to
work out which range of changes to apply.
BR
David
Hi
During long svn operations such as checkout I am often getting the following
error:
'svn: REPORT of '/subversion/myproj/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response
body: Secure connection truncated'
This is on Windows XP, accessing a repo whose trunk is of size 300MB (12,000
files) approx.
Hi
My most recent commit was the creation of a tag. I want to delete that tag.
Should I reverse merge the commit or simply delete the tag?
If I do a reverse merge I see a tree conflict:
C:\>svn merge -c -69
--- Reverse-merging r69 into '.':
C tags\TAG_
--- Recording mergeinfo for reverse
Hi
I am using perl script svn_load_dirs.pl to commit changes in a vendor library
to my repo. I am running the script on Linux (Centos 5).
The script reports the following error:
svn: E29: Cannot set 'svn:executable' on a directory
('/tmp/svn_load_dirs_ePetHNpzS3/my_import_wc//build/solaris
I think I have fixed this by adding option:
-no_auto_exe
to the svn_load_dirs command.
Best regards
David
Hi
Path-Based Authorization is described here:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.pathbasedauthz.html
Having read that description, it is not clear to me what happens in this
situation:
groupA = fred
groupB = fred, jane
[myRepo:/]
@groupA = rw
@groupB = r
Is fred's acces
> > groupA = fred
> > groupB = fred, jane
> >
> > [myRepo:/]
> > @groupA = rw
> > @groupB = r
> >
> > Is fred's access to myRepo:/ 'rw' or 'r'?
>
> The user always gets the union of all rights given her by a rule; in other
> words, the maximum access rights defined in any entry in a rule.
Thanks
> > Thanks for your answer. So, to be absolutely clear, fred's access is 'rw'?
>
> Yes.
Thanks again,
David
Hi
I just wanted to report that we are affected by this bug and would be grateful
if the developers will include Marc Strapetz's patch (submitted on developers
mailing list on 11 Dec) in the next Subversion release.
Best regards
David
Hi
I would be grateful for some advice on how to maintain a release branch.
Suppose we create a release branch, finalise the work and make the release. We
then maintain fixes for that release on that branch.
Q1. As we apply fixes to the release branch, should we also manually apply
those fixe
merging later?
BR
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2016 11:50
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to maintain a release branch?
>
> Hi David,
> On 11/14/2016 11:45 AM, David Aldrich
Hi
I am running svn 1.9.5 on Windows 10.
We run many repos under svn, and they have run fine for years.
In the last 24 hours one of our svn repositories has started exhibiting
problems. When I run 'svn update' against one of its branches the update does
not complete, it hangs.
I have tried w
>
>
>From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com]
>Sent: 08 March 2017 10:55
>To: users@subversion.apache.org
>Subject: Re: update runs forever
>
>On 3/8/2017 11:39 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
>Hi
>
>I am running svn 1.9.5 on Windows 10.
>
>We run many repo
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: 08 March 2017 15:44
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: David Aldrich ;
> users@subversion.apache.org; Stefan Hett
> Subject: Re: update runs forever
>
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on We
Hi
The merging of one our branches is broken and I would welcome some help to fix
it please.
One of our developers merged to the branch from trunk, but failed to commit the
changes to the top of the branch so the mergeinfo was lost. He also
cherry-picked the files, so it was a bit of a mess.
I've fixed it. I was mistaken, a mergeinfo property was set on the offending,
lower-level folder. Deleting that resulted in a complete merge.
From: David Aldrich [mailto:david.aldr...@emea.nec.com]
Sent: 25 January 2018 10:16
To: 'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subver
Hi
I have a branch to which I have carefully merged all changes from the trunk
over the past year. Today I want to reintegrate the branch into the trunk.
When I attempt to do so I get error:
Reintegrate can only be used if revisions 8908 through 10479 were
previously merged from /trunk
to the re
Hi Stefan
Thanks for your reply. I am using svn 1.11.
I tried the command you suggested but, although it succeeded, there was
nothing to commit afterwards.
best regards
David
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:58 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:31:12PM +0000, David Aldr
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:09:19PM +0000, David Aldrich wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. I am using svn 1.11.
> >
> > I tried the command you suggested but, although it succeeded, there was
> > nothing to commit afterwards.
>
>
Hi
In our embedded projects we have a register interface maintained by our HW
team and software that uses that register interface maintained by our SW
team. As the interface is constantly changing, we want the software source
files to reference a fixed version of the interface.
In some projects
> Of course you can use externals that point to the same repository. Even
better, you can use 'relative' externals for such cases.
Thanks for your answer.
Does svn path based authorization support nested groups?
group_a = fred,jim
group_b = jane,@group_a
Best regards
David
Hi
We run a Jenkins job that lists the branches and tags of a certain svn
repository by running 'svn ls'.
The command, of course, requires svn authentication and so a password must
be provided. Jenkins has a svn plugin which allows it to check out from
svn repositories, using stored credentials,
s
David
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:03 AM Daniel Sahlberg <
daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den tis 19 jan. 2021 kl 10:47 skrev David Aldrich <
> david.aldrich.n...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> We run a Jenkins job that lists the branches and tags of a certa
Hi Mark
Thanks for your reply - that's very helpful.
Best regards
David
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:45 PM Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:39 PM David Aldrich <
> david.aldrich.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel
>>
>> Thanks for your re
I'm trying to rename a directory and I get this error on commit:
Adding TML/RIC_Initial_Use_Case_Analysis
svn: E155011: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E155011: Directory '//Feasibility Studies/Use Case
Analysis/TML/RIC_Initial_Use_Case_Analysis' is out of date
svn: E160013: File not
rtman
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:54 AM David Aldrich
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to rename a directory and I get this error on commit:
> >
> > Adding TML/RIC_Initial_Use_Case_Analysis
> > svn: E155011: Commit failed (details follow):
>
Hi Daniel and Nathan
Thanks for your replies.
The client is svn 1.13.0
The server is 1.14.0
Protocol is http
Before the rename I see:
$ ls
'Traffic Steering' drafts
The svn mv yields:
$ svn mv Traffic%20Steering RIC_Initial_Use_Case_Analysis
svn: E155010: Path '/home//SVNProj/mnd-ric/Feas
Hi
I am trying to reintegrate a branch into the trunk.
I first merged trunk to branch, which was committed at r16824.
I then merged trunk to branch:
svn merge --reintegrate ^/MyRepo>/branches/MyBranch
svn: E160013: '/subversion/MyRepo/!svn/rvr/16824/MyRepo/branches/MyBranch'
path not found
Wh
This was a mistake and is fixed now.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:21 PM David Aldrich
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to reintegrate a branch into the trunk.
>
> I first merged trunk to branch, which was committed at r16824.
>
> I then merged trunk to branch:
>
> svn m
changes.
Is there any way I can stop this happening for those files?
Best regards
David
David Aldrich | Consultant Engineer | NEC Telecom Modus Ltd | Olympus House,
Cleeve Road, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT22 7SA, GB | t: +44 (0) 1372 381857 | m: |
w: www.nec.com
Hi Andreas
Thanks for your reply. It fixed my problem.
Best regards
David
problem?
Should we use ssh authentication? Bearing in mind that we would only do so for
a subset of users.
Best regards
David
David Aldrich | Consultant Engineer | NEC Telecom Modus Ltd | Olympus House,
Cleeve Road, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT22 7SA, GB | t: +44
Hi Doug
Thanks for your reply.
> Gnome keyring is the normal answer, yes. Once setup it's pretty stable.
The issue for us is that I believe Gnome keyring requires a GUI desktop. We
want something that works in a terminal ssh session (no desktop). Do you know
of a way around this?
Would svn+s
Hi
As a result of merging from trunk to a branch using a 1.7 svn client. Several
directories now have conflicts. For example, directory 'Documents' contains
dir_conflicts.prej, which contains:
Trying to delete property 'svn:mergeinfo'
but the local property value is different.
<<< (local pr
Hi
We are running a svn 1.7 server.
One of our repositories contains an artefact that is 4GB. It consists of a set
of regression test results that we want to version control. This artefact
changes infrequently - say every month or two - but it's enormous size is
causing concern for IT Manage
al Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: 15 July 2013 10:50
> To: David Aldrich; 'users@subversion.apache.org'
> (users@subversion.apache.org)
> Subject: RE: How to prune old versions of an artefact?
>
> > -Original Message-
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo