As you've discovered, externals *always* pull in the HEAD revision unless you
specifically add a revision number to the svn:externals property. Needless to
say, "rogue" svn:externals are bad for build reproducibility and tagging.
Options are:
Audit the svn:externals (either manually, via a chec
Anyone familiar with this svnsync bug/issue? I didn't see anything substantive
via google or in the svn issue tracker.
C:\>svnsync sync svn://localhost/devel_mirror
Transmitting file data ..
svnsync: E160016: Path
'DigitalDelivery/DigitalSecure/ddp/aps/shared/apss-ddp-ejb
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:jreed...@incomm.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:26 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svnsync: E160016: Path ... not present
>
> Anyone familiar with this svnsync bug/issue? I didn't see a
Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format
lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such an
old repo, all of which fail with "svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file
'devel\db\current': The system cannot find the file specified."
Do I n
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Bruni [mailto:jbr...@icloud.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:09 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)
>
> > On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:0
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:jreed...@incomm.com]
>
> > > On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The
> > > db/format lists &
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Are we talking about the repository format or the FSFS format here? If
> /db/fs-type says "fsfs" then the repository format
> (/format) is probably 3 and you're talking about /db/format,
> yes? The distinction is i
Works for me.
svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264)
Windows 7
C:\Users\jdoe\workspace\foobar>svn pl -v A.txt
Properties on 'A.txt':
pebls:plcm
Test@4575
pebls:sha1
8cd8818d6b4f5edcb8b6e25cdf471af62bca403c
C:\Users\jdoe\workspace\foobar>svn rename A.txt AA.txt
A A
> From: Dan Ellis [mailto:danelli...@gmail.com]
>
> **Brane asked: There's no REN.txt in your example.
> **Anyway, please tell us which version of the client you're using (svn
> --version) and where it came from.
>
> I meant to exclude that as its not relevant, was trying to point out the
> e
SubversionEdge from collabnet is a pre-packaged solution that takes most of the
effort out of setting up svn + http/https:
http://www.collab.net/products/subversion
From: Novinsky, Stanley J. [mailto:stan.novin...@jhuapl.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 5:54 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.or
Since you're moving from windows to Ubuntu, you can run the dump/load process
over ssh to avoid having to deal with bloated dump files:
http://martin.ankerl.com/2006/01/24/svnadmin-dump-and-load-over-ssh/ (You can
use mobaxterm (http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/ ) on Windows, which is a Cygwin
ba
> -Original Message-
> From: Timur Khanipov [mailto:khani...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:20 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: Иван Коптелов
> Subject: Two-step merge ok, one-step merge conflicts
>
> Hi folks.
>
> I faced the following problem. The command
>
I was under the impression that subversion now automatically takes subtree
mergeinfo into account:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.stayinsync.subtree
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com]
Go here https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes select a release and
then look at the “Feature Compatibility Table” which will specify which
features require what server/client version.
However, as already noted, basic features will work with any 1.x client and 1.x
server.
From: Leon
> From: Doug Robinson [mailto:doug.robin...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:49 PM
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Mark McKeown; Andreas Stieger; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: which version control supports file locking and who has it locked
>
>
> I'm not sure about Perforce'
> From: Michael Schwager [mailto:mschw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:25 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Creating and Verifying a Reliable backup
>
> Following is an update to my question of Jun 1, where I ask the following
> question:
>
... snip verify/back
> Hello! I've been having trouble getting my own pre-revprop-change hook script
> to work. Svn was refusing any change to a revprop with the following error:
>
> svn: E165001: Revprop change blocked by pre-revprop-change hook (exit code 1)
> with no outpu
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 9:38 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
>
> On 14.10.2016 14:58, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> >> Hello! I
Not a complete solution, but it's a start. Craft a "svn mkdir" that includes
the url to test and a url that will always fail, e.g.
svn mkdir -m "" http://server/repo/dir2test/a
http://server/repo/readonly/z
However, it looks like the urls are sorted and then processed in sort order
(i
> From: horst.schl...@gmx.de [mailto:horst.schl...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 4:04 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to checkout only the changes
>
>
> Is there a way to export only the changes, that occured in a specific
> revision? Like export or checkout only the
echo svn export --force "$SVNREPO/$i@$REV" "$D/"
done
-Original Message-
From: horst.schl...@gmx.de [mailto:horst.schl...@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:28 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to checkout only the changes
On 03/27/
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:41 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: horst.schl...@gmx.de; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to checkout only the changes
>
> 'vsvn diff
> From: Eggler, Ron (GE Energy Connections) [mailto:ron.egg...@ge.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 7:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn feature addition?
>
> Hi There,
>
> I am looking for the following features in svn:
> - When you do svn commit, instead of automatically
It’s been awhile, but isn’t changing the commit message (after a push)
potentially problematic in git?
>> Does anyone know how long it would take to export the repository of this
>> size? This will give us an estimate how long to schedule down time and cut
>> off time.
Svnsync is the easy option.
If you insist on doing a dump/load, then a) you can time a test run of a
dump/load, and b) "svnadm
> -Original Message-
> From: Lorenz [mailto:loren...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 1:34 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Individual file merge . Merging a newly added file
>
> JP wrote:
> >I am trying to merge a newly added file . I am getting the follo
> From: David Sandberg [mailto:david.sandb...@hickorytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:18 PM
>
> 1) User Jim commits a new file A with the Revision keyword to the trunk
> in revision 101.
> 2) User Sam merges trunk revision 101 into his feature branch, and the
> new file A comes across
> -Original Message-
> From: David Sandberg [mailto:david.sandb...@hickorytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:52 PM
>
> Thank you for that crystal clear explanation, which accounts perfectly
> for the observed behavior. I will add that I am not sure I agree with
> the correctnes
Is it just me or is svn log's "--xml" switch not including
"--use-merge-history" information?
The text output of "svn log --use-merge-history" includes the "Merged via:
r3673" information:
r3584 | bob | 2013-04-16 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 4:24 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: "svn log --xml --use-merge-history ..." doesn't include
> --use-merge-history in the xm
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 11:53 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: mergeinfo between svn copied branches and merges
>
> we have branchA
> we svn copy branchA to produce branchB
> branches A and B continues development and checkins
> branchA
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 6:49 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mergeinfo between svn copied branches and merges
>
> In this case, all you should have to do is:
> a) merge branchC
You can do a fresh checkout and not include project10 in the initial update:
svn co -N svn://.../top_dir
cd top_dir
cd svn update project1 project2 ... project 9
Future 'svn update' commands in the top_dir directory will only update projects
1 through 9.
Or you can explicitly not update project 1
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 3:05 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi All
>
> We use SVN 1.6
>
> We have a revision number which refuses to move to the merged list after
> applyi
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:09 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for responding; appreciate it.
>
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 8:25 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for taking the time to respond.
&g
Problem: Subversion doesn't have branches.
Subversion has directory objects, and we Humans(tm) arbitrarily decide that
some directories are "branches," thereby giving these directories (branches)
magical powers and mystical significance. Meanwhile, Subversion grinds on,
treating those magic
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> Well, given that you have no
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:57 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branc
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> a
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:05 AM
> To: Zé
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:24 AM
> To: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> .. snip
>
> You keep sa
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: Zé
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> So wh
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:30 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> Guten Tag Bob Archer,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:24 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
> Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the St
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Bob Archer
> Cc: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> Of
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:33 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branc
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:32 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> On 21.05.2013 20:26, Branko Či
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:36 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> a
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Baumanis [mailto:gbauma...@cogstate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 12:31 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Merging change sets for a production release,
> Importance: High
>
> At the moment we do all of our work on /trunk and also have
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Baumanis [mailto:gbauma...@cogstate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:27 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Merging change sets for a production release,
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Thanks for
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> We are seeing a strange anomaly after our last check-in - on fresh checkout
> there is a tree conflict into a new path - I'v
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:12 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> I can reproduce on the versions specified above of the CygWin svn client
&
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> A my_project_03b_pristine/Project/settings/MkSharedData.exe
> C my_project_03b_pristine/Project/settings/MkImage
> A
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:45 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
> Thanks for your help, I will try again this.
> But this is very poor compared to ClearCase. Nobody tried to script that ?
I u
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:42 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
> Thanks All for your help and advices,
> But :
>
> With CC, I can easily search for any file element in a repository, and
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:57 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
>
> Thanks All again for your help,
>
>
> > If you're just trying to find a file in the current version of the repo,
> > t
> From: C M [mailto:cmanalys...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 12:39 PM
> To: C. Michael Pilato
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Ancestrally Related Error Message
>
> I think my earlier mistake might have been that I was using the --reintegrate
> option.
> Without it, I make some prog
> From: Marc Davenne [mailto:marc.dave...@cramif.cnamts.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Question about subversion
>
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
>
>
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like
I just had a commit fail midway on three different 1.8 clients without any kind
of error logged in the output, in the client's Event Viewer (Win7,) or on the
repo server's httpd logs (linux.) No dump file either. Starting with a fresh
checkout made no difference. There's no pre-commit hook.
"svn add" is having trouble with *.png files. This is with a 1.8 and a 1.7.9
client.
I create a new test repository, copy in some vender code, then when I run "svn
add" I get the following error on 1.8:
svn add build-pipeline-plugin-1.3.3
...
A build-pipeline-plu
To add insult to injury, TortoiseSVN's add just died on a .css file:
C:\temp\test18\foo\src\main\webapp\css
C:\temp\test18\foo\src\main\webapp\css\jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
File 'C:\temp\test18\foo\src\main\webapp\css\jquery.tooltip.css' has
inconsistent newlines
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:22 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "svn add" failing with "svn: E29: Can't set 'svn:eol-
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:00 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "svn add" failing with "svn: E29: Can't set 'svn:eol-
s binary mime type property" and/or inconsistent newlines
>
> On 09.07.2013 20:33, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> > Bingo. "Somewhere" was the operative word. The Collabnet config
> file was being read from my roaming profile instead of from my windows
> home dir.
>
> Yo
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:18 AM
> To: Ryan Schmidt
> Cc: Subversion Users
> Subject: RE: Strange behavior
>
> Thanks for your help, but I still do not know how to get this to work.
> Perhaps I should give a little
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:27 PM
> To: Bob Archer; Edwin Castro; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Strange behavior
>
> Thanks Bob, that may be exactly what I am looking for. Something that
> would affect
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:40 AM
> To: Thorsten Schöning; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Strange behavior
>
> Hi Thorsten
>
> A good response to a less than good post. People could take lessons
> from
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: Subversion help
> Subject: Switching
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to thank all who have been helpful. I have gotten my test project to
> merge branches successfully. Now I am trying it on our production code an
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 1:33 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; Subversion help
> Subject: RE: Switching
>
> Thanks for your reply. I agree it does not make sense. But it is
> reproducible
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:21 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Switching
>
> How would you like Subversion to work in your case? From my
> understanding it breaks down to something
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Thorsten Schöning; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Switching
>
>
> The problem isn't something in the way, the problem is something is
> the
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Kishalmi [mailto:lkisha...@ovi.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:15 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Feature Req: sorthand urls for branches/tags in CLI
>
>
>
> Implementation ideas:
> We put a specific property on project
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Edwin Castro
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Switching
>
>
> I can't, off the top of my head, think of a scenario where it would be
> harmful to replace an unversioned
> From: Jay Vee [mailto:jvsr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 5:09 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: how to simply : $svn update ?
>
> I do '$svn status'
> and get that I am at a certain revision
>
> Type 'svn help' for usage.
> cpu:/dir>svn update
> At revision 32933.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 9:09 AM
> To: Vesa Paatero
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How about a troubleshooting guide for tree conflicts?
> The SVN Book has a short chapter about tree conflicts w
/wsbi:4277,4378
Missing ranges: /portal/trunk/wsbin:4273
Andrew Reedick
CBeyond
Cloud Development, SCM
O: 678.486.8163
> From: Goor, Stefan [mailto:sg...@thetasgroup.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:40 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: SVN merge attempting to reintegrate on a merge to a branch
>
>
> Recently when we attempted to merge a trunk project to a branch (in
> preparation of doi
> -Original Message-
> From: Goor, Stefan [mailto:sg...@thetasgroup.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVN merge attempting to reintegrate on a merge to a branch
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 5:35 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Goor, Stefan; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVN merge attempting to reintegrate on a merge to a branch
>
> On Fr
> From: C M [mailto:cmanalys...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 4:05 PM
> To: Les Mikesell
> Cc: Bob Archer; Subversion
> Subject: Re: Shared branch vs single branch
>
> Unfortunately, we are lacking on processes and there's a definite lack of
> product management.
> But coming ba
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Field [mailto:geoff_fi...@aapl.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:27 PM
> To: Bert Huijben; 'JANIKOVIC Jan'; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Problem with adding files in SVN 1.8.0+. Is it in the
> tracker already?
> Hi Bert,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Richter [mailto:sver...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:29 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Copy changes from one branch to another
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the following setup
>
> trunk branch A (created from trunk)
> |
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Richter [mailto:sver...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:43 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Copy changes from one branch to another
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:14 AM
> To: Andy Levy
> Cc: Subversion help
> Subject: RE: Branch changes
>
> Thanks for your reply Andy, that was helpful. For anyone else interested, to
> get the revision where the b
> From: Gabriela Gibson [mailto:gabriela.gib...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 7:24 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to display the code in my branch without merge changes?
>
> My goal is to get svn to show the current version of my code, without the
> merged c
> -Original Message-
> From: Alfred Perlstein [mailto:bri...@mu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:55 AM
> To: Gabriela Gibson; John Maher
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to display the code in my branch without merge changes?
> >
> > ...snip...
> >
> >
> If yo
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 9:19 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn: E195016: merge error is dropping last character of path
>
> So... any reason why the last character in paths are getting dropp
> From: Michel Archambault [mailto:micj...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:25 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn diff on root folder (like d:\) crash on Windows
>
>
>
> Bug found on:
> - Windows 7 64-bit
> - svn 1.8.4
> - Working copy in d:\ directly (not in a s
> -Original Message-
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 7:12 AM
> To: Vladislav Javadov
> Cc: Blair Zajac; Andreas Mohr; Geoff Rowell; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svnmucc
>
> Brother, unweaving the quotes is its own proble
> From: vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za
> [mailto:vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:09 AM
> To: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Looking into using Subversion
>
> Thank for your response Nico. We what to debug from our development server.
> From: vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za
> [mailto:vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:47 AM
> To: Ben Reser
> Cc: Chris Shelton; Nico Kadel-Garcia; Subversion; bob.arc...@amsi.com; Andrew
> Reedick
> Subject: Re: Looking into using Sub
> From: Edward Ned Harvey (svn4) [mailto:s...@nedharvey.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:13 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Branch/switch/merge question
>
> In particular, I branch (and switch) from /trunk to /branches/eharvey. I
> then make a few commits. I switch b
> -Original Message-
> From: Alfred von Campe [mailto:alf...@von-campe.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 3:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Help with post-commit script
>
> I need to implement a post-commit hook that does the following in a
> "standard" Subversion
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 1:14 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Alfred von Campe; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with post-commit script
>
>
> > svnlo
> From: Pablo Beltran [mailto:pbeltr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 3:29 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: log reporting some strange (for me) merged paths
> (Q.1)Why is the
>
> M /sis/branches/JDK7/ide-project/NetBeans/nbproject/genfiles.properties
>
> present in
> -Original Message-
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 2:47 AM
> To: Ben Reser
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Keyword expansion from merged changes
>
>
> > So in my opinion I don't think this is a good suggested featu
Do you have write access to the dirs/files in %APPDATA%\Subversion\auth\...?
I’ve seen cases on the Unix side where the cached auth files magically become
readonly (444) which prevents password caching. Very annoying.
From: darkdragon [mailto:darkdragon-...@web.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2
s a reverse merge:
andrew
2014-01-16T19:41:15.571931Z
/trunk
/trunk/a.txt
svn merge -c -15 .
==>
andrew
2014-01-16T19:37:17.531316Z
/branches/test/a.txt
100 matches
Mail list logo
