On Apr 26, 2011, at 19:33, Hashir Baqai wrote:
> Johan,
>
> I've seen this referenced wherever the issue arises. Pasting what I assume is
> the portion that is of interest:
>
> Is Subversion a Day Early?
>
> If you specify a single date as a revision without specifying a time of day
> (for e
Thanks a lot for you useful responses!
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Ryan Schmidt <
subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 11:47, Jonatan Soto wrote:
>
> > We are facing some problems during a merge process from a branch to trunk
> (2 URL merge). Note that we didn't s
On Apr 26, 2011, at 18:46, Tony Butt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 02:31 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>
>> Is it possible the document has mixed line ending styles? -- some lines
>> ending with CRLF and some ending with LF? If so, fix this, ideally by making
>> use of the svn:eol-style prope
Hi Mike,
Sorry if we were mistaken, but when the merge finishes (following Ryan's
indications) it says:
Summary of conflicts:
Text conflicts: 15
Tree conflicts: 8
Perhaps the problem is that we are using the latest subclipse plugin as a
client and if we are not wrong it is based on 1.6 clien
> Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported.
> When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ...
Hi Johan
Thanks very much for doing this review.
Best regards
David
Hi Nico,
Can I start by offering to provide a trial copy of Subversion Multisite (or
even a pre-configured virtual environment to save you time) for you to prove
to yourself how we solve these challenges? Many enterprise SVN deployments
use our software and if your assertions were true that certai
Hi,
I am fairly new to version control, and have made what is probably a
newbie mistake.
I created a branch and switched to it. Later I committed changes that
were meant for trunk, forgetting that I had switched to the branch. So
I want to undo this, without losing the changes..
What is the correct
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 03:27 PM, Ben Carbery wrote:
Hi,
I am fairly new to version control, and have made what is probably a
newbie mistake.
I created a branch and switched to it. Later I committed changes that
were meant for trunk, forgetting that I had switched to the branch. So
I want to u
I should have mentioned a couple of things..
I have added directories, and moved some files. Also I am using svn1.4
(still the current Red Hat release) which I understand has a much limited
version of merge than 1.5+
I tried merging but got a lot of errors - if this is the right way to go
about it
Hi everyone,
I am undertaking a massive code review, one side effect of which is that I am
creating, deleting, and renaming lots of files. I want some of these files to
be marked as "done" and the others to be unmarked. Then, if I want to know what
is left to do in my code review, I can identi
Same thing there as well.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 4:15 PM
To: Platz, Steve
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Windows SSL Error
And what about the system-wide file then? /etc/subversion/servers?
On Tue,
I think one should use code reviewing tools to handle this scenario. Using svn
properties to mark a big chunk reviewed is fine but when it comes to more
granular level, then it makes sense to shift to code reviewing tools as they
are
meant to take care of all those scenarios.
Ankush
_
On 4/27/11 5:34 AM, Ben Carbery wrote:
I should have mentioned a couple of things..
I have added directories, and moved some files. Also I am using svn1.4 (still
the current Red Hat release) which I understand has a much limited version of
merge than 1.5+
If you are running RHEL 5, the current
On Apr 27, 2011, at 05:34, Ben Carbery wrote:
> I have added directories, and moved some files. Also I am using svn1.4 (still
> the current Red Hat release) which I understand has a much limited version of
> merge than 1.5+
You would be wise to upgrade. Subversion 1.4 and earlier are not suppo
On Wednesday 27 April 2011, Ben Carbery wrote:
> I have added directories, and moved some files. Also I am using svn1.4
> (still the current Red Hat release) which I understand has a much limited
> version of merge than 1.5+
The first thing to do is to upgrade SVN. Even though this ancient RH rele
I did a search of my email address in IE8 - to see what information is out
there identifying me to everyone!
I found this link:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201001.mbox/%3c1a60ad0697a8964ea981a8de6f1dae0908f8f...@bggwrmb01.bge.ie%3E
and got my full name and work email
> I did a search of my email address in IE8 - to see what information
> is out there identifying me to everyone!
>
> I found this link:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-
> dev/201001.mbox/%3C1A60AD0697A8964EA981A8DE6F1DAE0908F8FCA0@BGGWRMB
> 01.bge.ie%3E
>
> and got my full n
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:45 -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
> wrote:
>
> > I've found using "*" to be non intuitive. Try:
> >
> > [/]
> > $authenticated=rw
> > jon=
>
> Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, jon still has full access...
>
> -Alan
Are you sure he has "full" access? Path base
> > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:45 -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've found using "*" to be non intuitive. Try:
> > >
> > > [/]
> > > $authenticated=rw
> > > jon=
> >
> > Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, jon still has full access...
> >
> > -Alan
>
> Are you sure he has
Robert Beattie wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 14:17:58 +0100:
> I did a search of my email address in IE8 - to see what information is out
> there identifying me to everyone!
>
> I found this link:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201001.mbox/%3c1a60ad0697a8964ea981a8de6f1
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Robert Beattie wrote:
> I did a search of my email address in IE8 – to see what information is out
> there identifying me to everyone!
>
>
>
> I found this link:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201001.mbox/%3c1a60ad0697a8964ea981a8de6f1d
Hi,
One of my team members made few changes to existing files in SVN.
When I performed SVN update, status shown is "Completed : "
But actually the files are not updated when checked for the changes.
I tried to perform SVN clean and update, even then it is the same.
When I deleted the files
> One of my team members made few changes to existing files in SVN.
> When I performed SVN update, status shown is "Completed :
> "
> But actually the files are not updated when checked for the
> changes.
> I tried to perform SVN clean and update, even then it is the same.
>
> When I deleted the f
Hi Bib
The version is .6.9 (r901367)
It is happening with new check out, but for one specific path.
Thanks & Regards,
Dinoj D
Desk: +91 80 26588360 Extn: 48547
Cell: +91 9916668051
-Original Message-
From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7:48 PM
T
We (Hyrum) also clarified the web site, adding an explicit mention of
the mailing lists' being public and archived.
Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:37:08 -0500:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Robert Beattie wrote:
> > I did a search of my email address in IE8 – to see what in
I am out of the office until 03/05/2011.
For any Notes issues, raise an Internal Support ticket for developers. For
queries, please send an email to UK-Notes Team.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: swapping trunk
and branch" sent on 27/04/2011 14:11:56.
This is the only
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:07 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> So the short answer is there's probably no way to do what you want
> except by creating a group with everyone but jon in it.
But I tried this already:
[groups]
ourcompany = alan,james,craig,tony,keith,ken
[/]
@ourcompany = r
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Alan M. Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:07 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> > So the short answer is there's probably no way to do what you want
> > except by creating a group with everyone but jon in it.
>
> But I tried this already:
>
> [groups]
> ou
On 4/27/2011 12:20 AM, Jonatan Soto wrote:
Sorry if we were mistaken, but when the merge finishes (following
Ryan's indications) it says:
Summary of conflicts: Text conflicts: 15 Tree conflicts: 8
Perhaps the problem is that we are using the latest subclipse plugin
as a client and if we are not
Alan M. Evans wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:51:03 -0700:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:07 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> > So the short answer is there's probably no way to do what you want
> > except by creating a group with everyone but jon in it.
>
I haven't read the thread, but this caught
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 21:03:25 +0300:
> Alan M. Evans wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:51:03 -0700:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:07 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> >
> > > So the short answer is there's probably no way to do what you want
> > > except by creating a group with
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 10:29 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
>
> That's very peculiar. What do you have set in svnserve.conf?
>
>
I'm using Apache, not svnserve, as I mentioned in my OP.
FWIW, the apache conf file for this repository looks like:
DAV svn
SVNPath /srv/svn/re
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:07 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Perhaps
>
> [/]
> ~jon = rw
Nope. jon still able to check out the entire repository tree.
So far, it seems that the only rules that make any difference are "* ="
and "$authenticated =". These give everybody access. Without one of
these p
Alan M. Evans wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:20:15 -0700:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:07 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Perhaps
> >
> > [/]
> > ~jon = rw
>
> Nope. jon still able to check out the entire repository tree.
>
Works for me with svnserve. You may need an explicit 'jon = ' entry
We have a SVN server running on a Debian Linux box. Running svn
--version returns:
svn, version 1.6.12 (r955767)
compiled Jul 28 2010, 08:58:12
Users uses TortoiseSVN client to access repositories residing on the
SVN server. My question is it OK to use the latest TSVN client
"TortoiseSVN-1.6.15
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 19:43, Tech Geek wrote:
> We have a SVN server running on a Debian Linux box. Running svn
> --version returns:
> svn, version 1.6.12 (r955767)
> compiled Jul 28 2010, 08:58:12
>
> Users uses TortoiseSVN client to access repositories residing on the
> SVN server. My questi
Ok running 1.6 now and repository upgraded. Must have been a recent RH
patch?
Somebody replied off-list and suggested I just manually recreate the changes
in trunk by comparing two working copies. This seemed slightly less painful
than merging and it worked. After that I just blew away the branch
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 02:05 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 18:46, Tony Butt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 02:31 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> Is it possible the document has mixed line ending styles? -- some lines
> >> ending with CRLF and some ending with LF?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Ian Wild wrote:
> Hi Nico,
> Can I start by offering to provide a trial copy of Subversion Multisite (or
> even a pre-configured virtual environment to save you time) for you to prove
> to yourself how we solve these challenges? Many enterprise SVN deployments
> us
I want to take one project from one repo and put it in a directory under
another repo. Is it possible to keep the history of said project?
TIA,
Listman
Andy Levy wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 20:05:54 -0400:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 19:43, Tech Geek wrote:
> > We have a SVN server running on a Debian Linux box. Running svn
> > --version returns:
> > svn, version 1.6.12 (r955767)
> > compiled Jul 28 2010, 08:58:12
> >
> > Users uses TortoiseSVN
Tony Butt wrote on Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:06:36 +1000:
> For me, using an external diff (gnu diff) with the offending package
> (codestriker) works fine in this case.
The internal diff has an option to ignore line endings. (and, at least
in trunk (don't know about 1.6), you can set that option i
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Ben Carbery wrote:
> Ok running 1.6 now and repository upgraded. Must have been a recent RH
> patch?
Not recent: it was published with RHEL 5.6.
Hello!
We've encountered a strange behaviour with our quite loaded (avg 1500 http
requests per sec) SVN server. The server (RHEL5) is serving SVN repositories
via https by Apache.
apache 2.2.9
subversion 1.6.5
neon-0.28.4-1
neon-devel-0.28.4-1
The problem is that occasionally couple of httpd pro
44 matches
Mail list logo
