Guten Tag David Player,
am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011 um 21:02 schrieben Sie:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are
> always broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or
> 1.2. Links have been supported in Windows since 2000, and improved
> in Vista in ear
Guten Tag David Weintraub,
am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011 um 23:34 schrieben Sie:
> Also, although NTFS
> supports junctions, it FAT32 doesn't, and many times the C: drive of a
> Windows box will be FAT32.
Absolutely no, using FAT32 for C: is unsupported for years now and
whoever uses it this w
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Player wrote:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
> broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have
> been supported in Windows since 2000, and improved in Vista in early 2007.
> The mklink ut
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:50:31PM -0700, David Player wrote:
> Thank you for those links. I believe that some of the details mentioned on
> those pages are wrong. The user does not need to be an administrator to use
> links. The user does require a permission to use one form of directory and
>
27;
Subject: Re: symlinks in Windows
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:02:31PM -0700, David Player wrote:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
> broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have
> been supported in Windows since 2000,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:02:31PM -0700, David Player wrote:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
> broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have
> been supported in Windows since 2000, and improved in Vista in early 2007.
> T
My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have been
supported in Windows since 2000, and improved in Vista in early 2007. The
mklink utility has been included since Vista.
Is there a workaroun
