Am Dienstag, 16. November 2010 schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the advantage of using
> >
> > ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
>
> This new format does support relative URLs.
>
> > compared to
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Ludwig, Michael wrote:
> Replying to myself now that I realize the issue:
>
> > From: Ludwig, Michael [mailto:michael.lud...@delphi-mb.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 3:21 PM
>
> > > > what is the advantage of using
> > > >
> > > > ^/trunk/proj
Replying to myself now that I realize the issue:
> From: Ludwig, Michael [mailto:michael.lud...@delphi-mb.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 3:21 PM
> > > what is the advantage of using
> > >
> > > ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
> >
> > This new format does support relative
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The new format is as follows: '[-rN] u...@m] PATH'
> The old format was: 'PATH [-rN] URL'
>
> The real difference between the old and new formats is that the URL cannot
> have a peg revision in the old format (support for p
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 16. November 2010 schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the advantage of using
> > >
> > > ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40
> > what is the advantage of using
> >
> > ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
>
> This new format does support relative URLs.
Are there many files beginning with a caret?
If not, it would also be convenient for:
* svn list
* svn cat
* svn copy
* svn move
* svn diff
* ...
Basically
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the advantage of using
>
> ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
This new format does support relative URLs.
> compared to
>
> -r 40 ^/trunk/project/subproject subproject
This old format doesn'
Hi,
what is the advantage of using
^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
compared to
-r 40 ^/trunk/project/subproject subproject
?
Is it the case that the first version works if ^/trunk/project/subproject is
deleted in a later revision and the second version fails?
Christoph