Guten Tag David Player,
am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011 um 21:02 schrieben Sie:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are
> always broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or
> 1.2. Links have been supported in Windows since 2000, and improved
> in Vista in ear
Guten Tag David Weintraub,
am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011 um 23:34 schrieben Sie:
> Also, although NTFS
> supports junctions, it FAT32 doesn't, and many times the C: drive of a
> Windows box will be FAT32.
Absolutely no, using FAT32 for C: is unsupported for years now and
whoever uses it this w
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Player wrote:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
> broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have
> been supported in Windows since 2000, and improved in Vista in early 2007.
> The mklink ut
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:50:31PM -0700, David Player wrote:
> Thank you for those links. I believe that some of the details mentioned on
> those pages are wrong. The user does not need to be an administrator to use
> links. The user does require a permission to use one form of directory and
>
27;
Subject: Re: symlinks in Windows
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:02:31PM -0700, David Player wrote:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
> broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have
> been supported in Windows since 2000,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:02:31PM -0700, David Player wrote:
> My company uses symlinks with svn quite a bit, but the symlinks are always
> broken in Windows. This has been the case since svn 1.1 or 1.2. Links have
> been supported in Windows since 2000, and improved in Vista in early 2007.
> T
