> I doubt if there is a generic answer to that question, but with RHEL6
> recently released, maybe Centos6 will be released soon enough for your
> next upgrade and won't be outdated for a while. If you want the
> tradeoffs of faster update cycles, the main players are fedora and
> ubuntu where fed
On 11/16/10 8:29 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
This is definitely off topic, but it's not RHEL4 or RHEL5 that's
unstable.
It's the engineering tools, if you run them on whichever is the latest
version of RHEL. Because the developers who produce the tools don't
have
access to the latest OS u
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> > This is definitely off topic, but it's not RHEL4 or RHEL5 that's
unstable.
> > It's the engineering tools, if you run them on whichever is the latest
> > version of RHEL. Because the developers who produce the tools don't
> have
> > access
On 11/16/2010 11:23 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
Hi
With some trepidation ;-) I would like to ask for opinions, somewhat related to
this thread.
My understanding is that RHEL is intended for servers that must be rock solid
e.g. Web servers. In our organisation we run Centos 5 (essentially the sa
Hi
With some trepidation ;-) I would like to ask for opinions, somewhat related to
this thread.
My understanding is that RHEL is intended for servers that must be rock solid
e.g. Web servers. In our organisation we run Centos 5 (essentially the same as
RHEL 5) on all our Linux development mac
On 11/16/2010 7:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Do we really need to continually rehash the discussion of why anyone would
ever use RHEL4???
No, but we needed to hash it enough to establish that your 'unstable'
comment about RHEL5 had to do with quirks of your environment or
choices, not tha
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> > This has already been mentioned in this thread. I can't speak for
> > anyone else, but I personally support engineers and engineering tools.
> > The engineering tools are only supported on the latest 2 versions of
> > RHEL/centos. Of whic
On 11/15/10 8:23 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Has someone had specific problems with the rpmforge rpms? I've been
using them on centos5 without any trouble,
Neither rpmforge, nor epel has subversion>= 1.5 for rhel4.
Umm, OK - we're way off topic now but I'd ask the same question about
run
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> > On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from
> > source.
> > Here is my build script:
> >>
> >> Has someone had specific problems with the rpmforge rpms? I've been
> >> using them on centos5 without any trouble,
>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> (b) other than building from source, there's no better way that I know to
> get the latest svn 1.6 in rhel4 / rhel5. AKA, there are no rpm's available
> that I know of, which I trust more than building from source as described.
For RP
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>>
>> On 11/15/2010 9:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> >
>> >>> On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from
> source.
>> >>> Here is my build script:
>>
>> Has some
On 11/15/2010 10:27 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
On 11/15/2010 9:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from
source.
Here is my build script:
Has someone had specific problems with the rp
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> On 11/15/2010 9:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> >
> >>> On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from
source.
> >>> Here is my build script:
>
> Has someone had specific problems with the rpmforge rpms? I've been using
>
On 11/15/2010 9:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from source.
Here is my build script:
Great: now reliably provide HTTP/HTTPS access for offsite repository use,
configure mod_dav_svn for local HTTP and HTTPS server usage, utilities
wi
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 4:38 PM
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
> wrote:
> >> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> >>
> >> RHEL 5 still directly only provides Subversion 1.4.2. EPEL will not
> >
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
>>
>> RHEL 5 still directly only provides Subversion 1.4.2. EPEL will not
> replace it in
>
> On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from source.
> Here is my build s
Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 00:23:54 -0500:
> ./configure --prefix=$INSTALLDIR --with-ssl && \
> make && \
> make install && \
> echo "" && \
> echo "installed ok: ${INSTALLDIR}/bin/svn"
set -e
./configure
make
make install
set +e
More readable?
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
>
> RHEL 5 still directly only provides Subversion 1.4.2. EPEL will not
replace it in
On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from source.
Here is my build script:
#!/bin/bash
VERSION=1.6.12
INSTALLDIR=/usr/local/subversion-$
On 11/12/10 8:09 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/12/10 6:11 PM, Dominic Lemire wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if a Subversion server can make use of multiple CPU cores
to
speed-up long operations? (not just simultaneous requests)
I'm p
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/12/10 6:11 PM, Dominic Lemire wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone know if a Subversion server can make use of multiple CPU cores
>> to
>> speed-up long operations? (not just simultaneous requests)
>>
>> I'm profiling my (dual core) ser
On 11/12/10 6:11 PM, Dominic Lemire wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if a Subversion server can make use of multiple CPU cores to
speed-up long operations? (not just simultaneous requests)
I'm profiling my (dual core) server running subversion 1.4.2 (and trac wiki),
and I realized the CPU usage o
21 matches
Mail list logo
