On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM Grierson, David
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
> > To: users@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn r
On 23.07.2015 11:15, Grierson, David wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
>> To: users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>
> On 22.07.2015 15:51, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >>
rs@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>>
>> Markus Schaber wrote on Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 13:01:09 +:
>>> All other commands need a --force or other explicit user decision to
>>> override user changed data, but
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: woensdag 22 juli 2015 13:43
> To: Markus Schaber
> Cc: Grierson, David ; d...@subversion.apache.org; 牛
> 暁冬 ; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old
On 21 July 2015 at 11:38, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> David Grierson wrote:
>> > "svn revert" will delete the local changes and nowhere to find, which
>> > is dangerous.
>> > I suggest the default behaiver should be save the local changed
>> > file(if any) to "filename.local" and do the re
Markus Schaber wrote on Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 13:01:09 +:
> All other commands need a --force or other explicit user decision to
> override user changed data, but the whole purpose of the "svn revert"
> command is to undo local changes - putting a --force option or
> something similar seems lik
Seems to me that stashing the before-reverted copies could go into some
"recycle bin" / "trash" folder underneath the .svn folder at the root of
the working copy. And by default, the client could clean out files
time-stamped over a month old, so it doesn't perpetually grow. Cleanup
could happen on
Guten Tag Grierson, David,
am Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015 um 17:48 schrieben Sie:
> If you don't specify prompt.
> If you do specify then you're saying one way or the other which you
> explicitly want.
That way you still force millions of users to behave differently now
because one user made a mista
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:06:06AM +0200, OBones wrote:
> Grierson, David wrote:
> >I completely understand that the action of sending to the Recycle Bin (in
> >TortoiseSVN) is very system specific.
> >
> >To simply rename the item being reverted as $item.$backupSuffix before then
> >restoring th
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: 21 July 2015 17:08
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>
> That way you still force millions of users to behave diff
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: 21 July 2015 16:09
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>
> > I would very much prefer if this could be an option th
Guten Tag OBones,
am Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015 um 11:06 schrieben Sie:
> I would very much prefer if this could be an option that is not enabled
> by default.
+1
I do revert frequently while merging branches and testing things and
would hate it to have to additionally manually remove files which I
> -Original Message-
> From: Markus Schaber [mailto:m.scha...@codesys.com]
> Sent: 21 July 2015 14:01
> To: Grierson, David; d...@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: 牛暁冬; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: AW: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
> ...
> I'm not really sure what t
Apologies for the previous top-posting ... I hate Outlook sometimes.
> -Original Message-
> From: OBones [mailto:obo...@free.fr]
> Sent: 21 July 2015 10:06
> To: Grierson, David; Andreas Stieger
> Cc: 牛暁冬; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save
Grierson, David wrote:
I completely understand that the action of sending to the Recycle Bin (in
TortoiseSVN) is very system specific.
To simply rename the item being reverted as $item.$backupSuffix before then
restoring the pristine item is presumably not that system specific?
Having this fu
age-
> From: Andreas Stieger [mailto:andreas.stie...@gmx.de]
> Sent: 21 July 2015 09:38
> To: Grierson, David
> Cc: 牛暁冬; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>
> Hello,
>
> David Grierson wrote:
> > > &qu
Hello,
David Grierson wrote:
> > "svn revert" will delete the local changes and nowhere to find, which
> > is dangerous.
> > I suggest the default behaiver should be save the local changed
> > file(if any) to "filename.local" and do the revert.
> >
> That's actually not a bad idea ... I've been bu
That's actually not a bad idea ... I've been burnt by this one a couple of
times myself.
Probably worth raising it with the d...@subversion.apache.org list to see if
it's something that they've considered previously.
David.
--
David Grierson - SDLC Tools Specialist
Sky Broadcasting - Customer B
19 matches
Mail list logo
