> -----Original Message----- > From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de] > Sent: 21 July 2015 17:08 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert > > That way you still force millions of users to behave differently now > because one user made a mistake once. I don't see the point in why > revert should break backwards compatibility ...
Backwards compatibility is a better (and valid) argument for not changing the behaviour of revert. I agree, for that reason, it should be an opt-in. Perhaps with a --keep option. (Hey look rational debate can change opinions on the Internet ... who knew ;) Dg. Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our internal and external networks. SKY and the SKY marks are trademarks of Sky plc and Sky International AG and are used under licence. Sky UK Limited (Registration No. 2906991), Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration No. 2067075) and Sky Subscribers Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) are direct or indirect subsidiaries of Sky plc (Registration No. 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph are incorporated in England and Wales and share the same registered office at Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD.
