Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-02-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Stefan Sperling wrote: > > After the 15000th commit, the size of the repository on disk is 5.5G > > with the working directory size being 120M. Besides, after several > > thousand commits to this directory SVN slows down considerably. This > > must be some design flaw (or peculiarity if you like)

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-02-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Les Mikesell wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:32:47PM +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >>After the 15000th commit, the size of the repository on disk is 5.5G > >>with the working directory size being 120M. Besides, after several > >>thousand commits to this directory SVN slows down considerably.

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-02-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On 2/8/2011 1:34 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:32:47PM +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: After the 15000th commit, the size of the repository on disk is 5.5G with the working directory size being 120M. Besides, after several thousand commits to this directory SVN slows down co

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-02-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:32:47PM +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > After the 15000th commit, the size of the repository on disk is 5.5G > with the working directory size being 120M. Besides, after several > thousand commits to this directory SVN slows down considerably. This > must be some design f

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-02-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Johan Corveleyn wrote: [dd] > But that doesn't explain why the resulting repository is so large > (compared to the original CVS repository). Sure, there might be memory > usage problems in dump/load (it uses more memory than the resulting > repository uses diskspace), but I think there is more go

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-01-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Victor Sudakov wrote on Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 14:18:00 +0600: >> Colleagues, >> >> I have finally completed a test cvs2svn conversion on an amd64 system. >> The peak memory requirement of svnadmin during the conversion was >> 9796M SIZE, 1880M

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-01-20 Thread Daniel Shahaf
That's not a nice result, but I think I said somewhere in this thread that there are known memory-usage bugs in svnadmin dump/load. Which means the fix (as opposed to 'workaround') to this issue is to have someone (possibly you or someone you hire) look into those bugs. With a bit of luck, this w

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-01-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > I have finally completed a test cvs2svn conversion on an amd64 system. > The peak memory requirement of svnadmin during the conversion was > 9796M SIZE, 1880M RES. The resulting SVN repo size is 8.5G on disk. > > "svnadmin du

RE: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-01-20 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Victor Sudakov [mailto:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru] > Sent: 20 January 2011 08:18 > Subject: Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file > > Colleagues, > > I have finally completed a test cvs2svn conversion on an amd64 system

Re: Betr.: Re: "svnadmin load" a huge file

2011-01-20 Thread Victor Sudakov
Colleagues, I have finally completed a test cvs2svn conversion on an amd64 system. The peak memory requirement of svnadmin during the conversion was 9796M SIZE, 1880M RES. The resulting SVN repo size is 8.5G on disk. "svnadmin dump --deltas" of this new SVN repo required 6692M SIZE, 2161M RES of