RE: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-09-01 Thread Jim Ravagno
r 01, 2012 11:01 AM To: Jim Ravagno Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Subversion 2.2 On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jim Ravagno wrote: > Hi, > I'm stuck with Windows 2003 server because of the budget. > I would have rather put this on a Solaris OS but that's wh

Re: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
l-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 5:25 PM > To: jrava...@comcast.net > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache Subversion 2.2 > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was asked to install

Re: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-09-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Jim Ravagno wrote: > Hi, > I'm stuck with Windows 2003 server because of the budget. > I would have rather put this on a Solaris OS but that's what I have to work > with, My second choice was Windows 2008 R2, but again I'm stuck with > 2003. Note that it is possibl

RE: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-09-01 Thread Jim Ravagno
@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Subversion 2.2 On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. They > asked for Subversion. > > > > This is a Rat Hole I didn't want to go down, not only to me

Re: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-08-31 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. They asked for > Subversion. > > > > This is a Rat Hole I didn't want to go down, not only to mention the > documention is horrible. Why is it a rat hole? > Apache 2.2> Tortoise> WebS

Re: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-08-31 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:27 AM, wrote: > I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. They asked for > This is a Rat Hole I didn't want to go down, not only to mention the > documention is horrible. > > Apache 2.2> Tortoise> WebSVN> PHP 4.3.0. and now Wix installer on Windows >

Re: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-08-31 Thread jravagno
I'll check it out Thank you, Jim - Original Message - From: "Mark Phippard" To: jrava...@comcast.net Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:56:31 AM Subject: Re: Apache Subversion 2.2 On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, < jrava...@c

RE: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-08-31 Thread Bob Archer
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, wrote: > I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. They asked for > Subversion. > > This is a Rat Hole I didn't want to go down, not only to mention the > documention is horrible. And now you want help from us rats? You must not read the sam

Re: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-08-31 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, wrote: > I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. They asked > for Subversion. > > > > This is a Rat Hole I didn't want to go down, not only to mention the > documention is horrible. > > Apache 2.2> Tortoise> WebSVN> PHP 4.3.0. and now Wix ins

RE: Apache Subversion 2.2

2012-08-31 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: jrava...@comcast.net [mailto:jrava...@comcast.net] > Sent: 31 August 2012 14:28 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Apache Subversion 2.2 > > Hi, Hello > I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. > They asked for Subversion. >