On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 06:49:07PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> /proc, though.. that one might more awkward to protect. Those are
>> nominally "files". Has anyone reviewed trying to protect /proc, or in
>> the case I mentioned /var
On Sunday, November 06, 2011 6:49 PM, "Nico Kadel-Garcia"
wrote:
> If device nodes and pipes are protected by being "unversioned" and
> impossible to "version",
It's definitely possible to have a special file obstruct a versioned file...
(svn checkout wc; /bin/rm wc/iota; mk{nod,fifo,..} wc/iot
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 06:49:07PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> /proc, though.. that one might more awkward to protect. Those are
> nominally "files". Has anyone reviewed trying to protect /proc, or in
> the case I mentioned /var/named/chroot/proc, from misapplied patches?
I don't think i
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:56:34AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Stefan, if I may suggest, special-casing file names is leaving trouble
>> lying in wait.
>
> Doing so was apparently git's idea, not ours.
Writing tools to translate bet
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:56:34AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Stefan, if I may suggest, special-casing file names is leaving trouble
> lying in wait.
Doing so was apparently git's idea, not ours.
> It would be safer to handle it via special file types.
> /dev/null is a "character special"
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 04:37:03PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> Currently, "/dev/null" is not special-cased (it is most certainly
>> special-cased in git), which causes one of the problem where a file
>> is added with a wrong
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 04:37:03PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Currently, "/dev/null" is not special-cased (it is most certainly
> special-cased in git), which causes one of the problem where a file
> is added with a wrong name.
> I think this should be fixed in 'svn patch', so
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 06:29:16PM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/11/5 Konstantin Kolinko :
> > Hi!
> >
> > My colleague uses Git to work on one of Apache projects. He published
> > a patch, but I have problems trying to apply it cleanly with "svn
> > patch".
There are several described i
2011/11/5 Konstantin Kolinko :
> Hi!
>
> My colleague uses Git to work on one of Apache projects. He published
> a patch, but I have problems trying to apply it cleanly with "svn
> patch".
>
> Source code:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk@1197793
> Patch:
> http://people.apache.org/~
Hi!
My colleague uses Git to work on one of Apache projects. He published
a patch, but I have problems trying to apply it cleanly with "svn
patch".
Source code:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk@1197793
Patch:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2011-11-03-redeploy-trunk-v2.patch
10 matches
Mail list logo
