On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 06:49:07PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > /proc, though...... that one might more awkward to protect. Those are > nominally "files". Has anyone reviewed trying to protect /proc, or in > the case I mentioned /var/named/chroot/proc, from misapplied patches?
I don't think it's worth adding a special-case for that. Again, while your /var/named/chroot/proc directory might be versioned (if you're versioning the chroot jail in SVN), any files or directories within it will be unversioned, and thus ignored by 'svn patch'. Unless you add files from the mounted proc file system to svn. And that is a very stupid thing to do.
