Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:40:34AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Rechecking my test environment, 1.6.16 builds well enough on RHEL >> 5/CentOS 5 with just the version change. RHEL 6 is a *disaster*, >> partly due swig integration. (RH

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:40:34AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Rechecking my test environment, 1.6.16 builds well enough on RHEL > 5/CentOS 5 with just the version change. RHEL 6 is a *disaster*, > partly due swig integration. (RHEL 6 finally has a recent enough swig > and sqlite not to need

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:13:00AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:33:41PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> The 1.6.16 has some minor build-s

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:13:00AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:33:41PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> The 1.6.16 has some minor build-structure changes that have broken the > >> SRPM's. I'm wonderin

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:33:41PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> The 1.6.16 has some minor build-structure changes that have broken the >> SRPM's. I'm wondering if it's even worth pursuing, for environments >> that don't rely on HTTP/

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:33:41PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > The 1.6.16 has some minor build-structure changes that have broken the > SRPM's. I'm wondering if it's even worth pursuing, for environments > that don't rely on HTTP/HTTPS authentication, especially because I'm > such a long-stan

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: > 03/07/2011 02:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia пишет: >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf >> wrote: >>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:00:15 -0500: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote:

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-17 Thread Konstantin Boyandin
03/07/2011 02:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia пишет: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:00:15 -0500: >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: >>>

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-14 Thread Kris Deugau
Boyandin Konstantin wrote: 06.03.11, 20:00, "Nico Kadel-Garcia": But there is also the RPMforge release of subversion-1.6.15 at http://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge/. Enjoy, I put up that one (based on variious previous releases.) I'd urge you to upgrade, ASAP, for a lot of *other* reasons. Tha

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-14 Thread Boyandin Konstantin
06.03.11, 20:00, "Nico Kadel-Garcia" : > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working > >> via Apache backend), OS CentOS 5.5, Su

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-11 Thread Konstantin Boyandin
03/06/2011 06:22 PM, Andy Levy writes: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working >> via Apache backend), OS CentOS 5.5, Subversion installed as RPM >> subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1 >> >> Client: F

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:00:15 -0500: >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote: >> > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin >> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> Setup: there's a server where S

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-06 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:00:15 -0500: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin > > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working > >> via Apache backen

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working >> via Apache backend), OS CentOS 5.5, Subversion installed as RPM >> subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1 Red

Re: 'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-06 Thread Andy Levy
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: > Hello, > > Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working > via Apache backend), OS CentOS 5.5, Subversion installed as RPM > subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1 > > Client: Fedora 14, Subversion installed from RPM > subver

'Could not get next bucket brigade' error

2011-03-05 Thread Konstantin Boyandin
Hello, Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working via Apache backend), OS CentOS 5.5, Subversion installed as RPM subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1 Client: Fedora 14, Subversion installed from RPM subversion-1.6.15-1.fc14.x86_64 Problem: until yesterday, everything was fine