03/06/2011 06:22 PM, Andy Levy writes: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 22:34, Konstantin Boyandin <li...@boyandin.name> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Setup: there's a server where Subversion repository is located (working >> via Apache backend), OS CentOS 5.5, Subversion installed as RPM >> subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1 >> >> Client: Fedora 14, Subversion installed from RPM >> subversion-1.6.15-1.fc14.x86_64 >> >> Problem: until yesterday, everything was fine. Yesterday and from now >> on, when I try to commit changes, I see messages like this on client side: >> >> $ svn commit -m "Test update" >> Sending 05/0/sh05p2.lyx >> Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow): >> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (500 Internal Server Error) in >> response to PUT request for >> '/books/!svn/wrk/03fb3e1c-cd66-4799-ad3d-3d68c5787936/private/Shamteran/05/0/sh05p2.lyx' >> >> On the server side, the following appears in Apache logs: >> [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] Could not get next bucket brigade [500, #0] >> >> I have rebuilt the repository from scratch, loaded the yesterday's dump >> (made prior to update that started to cause error), result is the same. >> >> I would appreciate advice on >> - how to find the reason for the error >> - how to fix it without creating a new repository from scratch and >> losing all the history of changes so far >> >> Running fsfsverify.py against the several latest rev file resulted in >> nothing. > > 2 points: > 1) SVN 1.4.x is no longer supported.
CentOS/RHEL do follow the tradition of keeping very old versions in their repositories. Unless absolutely unavoidable, I prefer not to compile the software pieces manually, otherwise I will end building almost everything from sources, with all the consequences. > 2) This is an Apache error, not Subversion. It can happen on servers > that don't even have Subversion installed. This may be relevant to > your installation: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572932 Thanks, the whole issue was malfunctioning hypervisor + faulty router device at the hoster's. As soon as they fixed the mentioned problems, the eerie 'buckert brigade' error was gone. Sincerely, Konstantin