Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2010-08-11 13:51:18 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:35:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> Yes, and this is another reason why the solution chosen by Subversion
>>> doesn't work well. For instance, GNOME always uses UTF-8 for filename
>>>
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2010-08-10 20:59:00 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> The native encoding is determined by the locale, but that does not matter.
>> The point is that, wherever encoding configuration happens to come from,
>> if the configured encoding cannot represent the character stri
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> $ export `gnome-keyring-daemon`
>
> Good, but ouch. Let's try adding a bit of rigor, shall we? First,
> before running such a daemon, always check that it actually exists,
> where you expect it to exist. Running random commands that will handle
> passwords which may ha
B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 19:07, Paul Ebermann wrote:
>> I think packing the revprops would (from a space viewpoint) be even more
>> useful than
>> packing the revisions, since most of these are quite small (similar) text
>> files.
>&g
Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Paul Ebermann wrote:
[...]
>> Is there any way to reduce the file number of the repository without
>> throwing away
>> information? As in, throw the changes in revisions 0 ... 999 together in one
>> file (and
Hello,
I have here a personal Subversion repository hosted on my university account
(for easy
access from everywhere via SSH). (Its format is a 1.5 FSFS, from the
information in the
meta-files.)
I'm now to revision 2529, which means the whole repository has 5098 files (most
of them in
db/revs
