B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 19:07, Paul Ebermann <paul-eberm...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I think packing the revprops would (from a space viewpoint) be even more >> useful than >> packing the revisions, since most of these are quite small (similar) text >> files. >> >> Statistics: [...] > > True, but revprops are mutable, while revs are immutable. OK, this explains it a bit. > That said, > packing of revprops has been implemented on trunk and will be coming > with 1.7. All my wishes come true :-) > You might consider the option using bdb instead of fsfs for your > repository. I wouldn't normally prefer bdb, but it does create far > fewer files than fsfs. I read[1] bdb does not work reliable on NFS, and my repository as on such a file system (and I can't really change this). Or does this reliability problem only concerns access from multiple hosts? (I in all cases access the repository via svn+ssh with the same server host, if this matters.) Paul [1]http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.reposadmin.planning.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backends.bdb
