Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Branko Čibej
On 15.11.2013 07:47, Stefano Fraccaro wrote: > Il 14/11/2013 22:35, Ben Reser ha scritto: >> Can you elaborate what method you're seeing method not allowed with? >> Or if you >> were running a svn client what command you were running? > TortoiseSVN > SVN Checkout >> >> The one case where we made s

Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Stefano Fraccaro
Il 14/11/2013 22:35, Ben Reser ha scritto: Can you elaborate what method you're seeing method not allowed with? Or if you were running a svn client what command you were running? TortoiseSVN > SVN Checkout The one case where we made such a change that comes to mind is with LOCK. LOCK per the

Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Ben Reser
On 11/14/13 2:07 AM, Stefano Fraccaro wrote: > while upgrading the subversion repository to version 1.8.4 the external > technician has also changed the folder name without notice. I lost many hours > because I haven't understood immediately that "method not allowed" means "url > not found" (in

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

2013-11-14 Thread Branko Čibej
On 14.11.2013 21:54, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 14.11.2013 21:44, Philip Martin wrote: >> Branko Čibej writes: >> >>> On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote: We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6. What do you think? Any alternatives I have not considered? Should I open a feature requ

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

2013-11-14 Thread Branko Čibej
On 14.11.2013 21:44, Philip Martin wrote: > Branko Čibej writes: > >> On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote: >>> We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6. >>> What do you think? Any alternatives I have not considered? Should I >>> open a feature request for this? >> I disagree with the behaviour ch

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

2013-11-14 Thread Philip Martin
Branko Čibej writes: > On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote: >> We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6. >> What do you think? Any alternatives I have not considered? Should I >> open a feature request for this? > > I disagree with the behaviour change because it makes 'svn delete' in > the pre

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

2013-11-14 Thread Branko Čibej
On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote: > Hello, > > At my company we are using the lock-modify-unlock model, with the > svn:needs-lock property set on most files. We have a pre-commit hook > that prevents committing unlocked files. We are currently on > Subversion 1.6.6. > > Here is a typical fr

svn delete removes read-only files

2013-11-14 Thread Rick Varney
Hello, At my company we are using the lock-modify-unlock model, with the svn:needs-lock property set on most files.  We have a pre-commit hook that prevents committing unlocked files.  We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6. Here is a typical frustrating sequence that happens when removing files:

Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Stefano Fraccaro
Hi to all, while upgrading the subversion repository to version 1.8.4 the external technician has also changed the folder name without notice. I lost many hours because I haven't understood immediately that "method not allowed" means "url not found" (in my case). It's possible to change th

Re: infinite recursive merging

2013-11-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:05:53PM +0100, nico wrote: > Hello dear SVN users, > > I have a problem with the merging mecanism in SVN. > > Here is a litttle case study: > We have 2 branches (B1, and B2) and the trunk (T), if you do the following: > commit -> Branch > merge B1 -> T > merge T -> B2