Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote: >> We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6.
>> What do you think? Any alternatives I have not considered? Should I >> open a feature request for this? > > I disagree with the behaviour change because it makes 'svn delete' in > the presence of svn:needs-lock behave exactly opposite to every other > command. IMO, it's quite enough to simply fix the bug where we try to > change the permissions on a non-existent local path. > > So I suggest you file a bug for that, not for the behaviour change. We won't fix this in 1.6 and 1.8 is already fixed: $ svn rm wc/A/f D wc/A/f $ svn st wc/A/f D wc/A/f $ svn lock wc/A/f 'f' locked by user 'pm'. $ svn st wc/A/f D K wc/A/f -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
