Creating sparse working copy retroactively from existing disjoint working copies

2012-08-15 Thread Robert Whitaker
QUESTION Is it possible to retroactively convert a "disjoint" working copy into a "sparse" working copy? === SUMMARY === I have not been able to do this, and a new feature request may be to add an "include" option to the --set-depth flag. The --set-depth flag already ha

mod_dontdothat RPM building problems with subversion-1.7.6

2012-08-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.6. > Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting: > > http://subversion.apache.org/download/#recommended-release Cool. I'm poking at getting a 1.7.6 SRPM set up for it. I

RE: Issues compiling SVN 1.7.5 on Solaris Sparc 9

2012-08-15 Thread Ferreira, Matthew
Ok, I got it...thanks for your help -Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:12 AM To: Ferreira, Matthew Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issues compiling SVN 1.7.5 on Solaris Sparc 9 Build from a tarball, not

Re: Issues compiling SVN 1.7.5 on Solaris Sparc 9

2012-08-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Build from a tarball, not from a tag. The latter requires Python. Ferreira, Matthew wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:59:01 -0400: > Thxdid that , ran in to some errors...realised it was half way through > the previous compile, so started fresh, remade config with flags, ran the > make proce

RE: Issues compiling SVN 1.7.5 on Solaris Sparc 9

2012-08-15 Thread Ferreira, Matthew
Thxdid that , ran in to some errors...realised it was half way through the previous compile, so started fresh, remade config with flags, ran the make process, hit the following: /bin/bash /tmp/svn_src/subversion-1.7.5/libtool --tag=CC --silent --mode=compile gcc -DSOLARIS2=9 -D_POSIX_PTHREA

Subversion 1.7.6 released

2012-08-15 Thread Philip Martin
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.6. Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting: http://subversion.apache.org/download/#recommended-release The SHA1 checksums are: 5b76a9f49e2c4bf064041a7d6b1bfcc3aa4ed068 subversion-1.7.6.tar.bz2 c6332c4d70685f903020

Re: files in db/locks

2012-08-15 Thread rog7...@web.de
Hello, Am 15.08.2012 13:35, schrieb Philip Martin: There was a bug that caused unlock to leave the files: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3667 It is fixed in 1.6.13 but the files will remain until a suitable new lock/unlock causes them to be deleted. Thank you for this hint

Re: files in db/locks

2012-08-15 Thread Philip Martin
"rog7...@web.de" writes: > Hello Daniel, > > Am 11.08.2012 00:29, schrieb Daniel Shahaf: >> If you lock /foo/bar/baz then db/locks/${hash} files are created for each of >> / , >> /foo , /foo/bar . >> >> Consequently, if (a) there are no locks in the repository, and (b) no >> locks are being add

Re: files in db/locks

2012-08-15 Thread rog7...@web.de
Hello Daniel, Am 11.08.2012 00:29, schrieb Daniel Shahaf: If you lock /foo/bar/baz then db/locks/${hash} files are created for each of / , /foo , /foo/bar . Consequently, if (a) there are no locks in the repository, and (b) no locks are being added or deleted (eg: the server is in read-only mo

Re: Current Wisdom on NFS/CIFS Checkouts & Working Copies

2012-08-15 Thread Philip Martin
Mark Bober writes: > What's the current wisdom on doing checkouts to NFS and CIFS? > > I'm seeing general checkout times of a given repository in the 2 > second range for local disk, and that jumps all the way up to a minute > and a half or more going over CIFS or NFS (Windows 2008R2 fileserver,