> -Original Message-
> From: KARR, DAVID [mailto:dk0...@att.com]
> Sent: 12 July 2012 17:34
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see
> older merge history on elements merged from branch to trunk?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Fr
On 12 July 2012 17:51, Jason Heeris wrote:
> I don't really know *what* constraints there are on honouring existing
> authz file syntax, whether or not it's explicitly specified.
Thorsten Schöning said: "How about just telling svn explicitly which
parse mode for section names one wants?"
I'd sug
Hello,
I've administered low volume svn repositories for approx. 7 years, and I'd like
to add my woes to those of other 'tree conflict' victims.
I have a small repo, to which I am the only one committing.
On one machine, I created a directory of source in the repo, but did not add it
to the r
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively, is there a way to "transform" a read-only mirror into a
>> normal repository? (I don't plan on doing this; it's just more for
>> curiosity.)
>
> I'm still curious about this one, but if no one knows it's not a big dea
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
>
> Now let's say my main repository goes down. I can restore the full
> backup from a week ago, but then how do I "replay" the extra revisions
> from the mirror into it?
>
> Is svnadmin dump and svnadmin load what I'm looking for?
Ok, ba
Thorsten Schöning wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 14:18:58 +0200:
> Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
> am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 um 14:14 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I am postmaster, and I didn't receive your message.
>
> I meant the postmaster of the former company of the user responsible
> for the bounce.
A
> -Original Message-
> From: KARR, DAVID
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:39 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see older merge
> history on elements merged from branch to trunk?
>
> It appears that our SVN on our server was recently
Hi all,
Dumb question here, but let's say I'm doing a weekly full backup with
svnadmin hotcopy, and a daily backup using svnsync to a mirror.
Now let's say my main repository goes down. I can restore the full
backup from a week ago, but then how do I "replay" the extra revisions
from the mirror
> -Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:00 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: KARR, DAVID
> Subject: RE: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see older merge
> history on elements merged from branch to trunk?
>
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 16:45:36 +0200:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:06:07 +0200:
> >> I think ']]' would be the best choice, but still not 100% backwards
> >> compatible. But I mean, who in th
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:18 +0200:
>> I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the
>> section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing
>
> Technically, 0x0A (newline) wou
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: KARR, DAVID [mailto:dk0...@att.com]
>> Sent: 12 July 2012 00:39
>> To: users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see older
>> merge history on elements merged from bran
Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 um 14:14 schrieben Sie:
> I am postmaster, and I didn't receive your message.
I meant the postmaster of the former company of the user responsible
for the bounce.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Thorsten Schöning E-Mail
Thorsten Schöning wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 18:03:49 +0200:
> Guten Tag Matthew Pounsett,
> am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2012 um 17:30 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I'm sure others have seen this too, but any time I post to the list
> > I'm getting a bounce from world.deshaw.com. Could an admin track
> > dow
Bob, can you email users-l...@subversion.apache.org please and grep the
output for "deshaw" ?
Bob Archer wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:13:34 -0400:
> If you send me the full email that is causing the bounce I can unsubscribe
> it. I haven't seen the bounces.
>
> BOb
>
>
> > -Original Me
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:06:07 +0200:
> I think ']]' would be the best choice, but still not 100% backwards
> compatible. But I mean, who in their right mind would write sections
> like this:
>
> [repo:/path/to/file.ext]]haha, this isn't parsed
We document the format as "i
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:18 +0200:
> I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the
> section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing
Technically, 0x0A (newline) would likely be a problem too. Not sure
that anyone uses it...
Guten Tag Jason Heeris,
am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 um 11:51 schrieben Sie:
> I don't really know *what* constraints there are on honouring existing
> authz file syntax, whether or not it's explicitly specified.
How about just telling svn explicitly which parse mode for section
names one wants?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jason Heeris wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 17:45, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> [Please try to keep the mails in plain-text]
>
> Oops, my apologies!
>
>> Things might be simpler when defining that lines that start with ‘[‘ and
>> end with ‘]’ should parse everything in betwe
The issue is filed as #4204:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4204
— Jason
On 12 July 2012 17:45, Bert Huijben wrote:
> [Please try to keep the mails in plain-text]
Oops, my apologies!
> Things might be simpler when defining that lines that start with ‘[‘ and
> end with ‘]’ should parse everything in between as section markers.
> But then, I don’t know how that affect
[Please try to keep the mails in plain-text]
The problem with using a ‘\’ would be that you break the ‘\’ character in
existing files to fix ‘]’.
Things might be simpler when defining that lines that start with ‘[‘ and end
with ‘]’ should parse everything in between as section markers.
On 12 July 2012 17:28, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the
> section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing
> function to make it handle some kind of escape sequence for ']'
> (perhaps ']]'). Would you care to write
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Jason Heeris wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 08:03, Jason Heeris wrote:
>>
>> I'll file it later today and see what response I get.
>
>
> Apparently I need a buddy with whom to file the bug. If anyone would be
> willing, I'd appreciate it.
>
> I've attached a bash script
24 matches
Mail list logo
