On 12 July 2012 17:28, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the > section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing > function to make it handle some kind of escape sequence for ']' > (perhaps ']]'). Would you care to write a patch [2]? >
I doubt I'll have time to write a patch any time in the next few days, but I'll file the bug now and take a look at writing a patch next week. I'd suggest avoiding inconsistencies like the double-]. I certainly wouldn't think to try that. It might be better to use a backslash sequence, or simply capture everything up to the *last* "]" on a line instead of the first. I don't think that would be more complex than needing to detect a "]]" ...but then, I haven't written the patch :P — Jason
