On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:32:05AM -0400, James Hanley wrote:
>> When creating a branch, it would be very useful if merge data could
>> optionally be included in svn status -u with the -g option.
>> Essentially, it would tell you if there ar
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:32:05AM -0400, James Hanley wrote:
> When creating a branch, it would be very useful if merge data could
> optionally be included in svn status -u with the -g option.
> Essentially, it would tell you if there are changes upstream from the
> origination of the branch... I'
When creating a branch, it would be very useful if merge data could
optionally be included in svn status -u with the -g option.
Essentially, it would tell you if there are changes upstream from the
origination of the branch... I'm not entirely certain what the output
should look like, but it might
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:08 AM, James Hanley wrote:
> There's no interest/descending/rebuttal opinion to this? Â Should I
> create a enhancement ticket? I thought that this was the medium to
> first propose changes/enhancements for discussion.
My 2 cents would be that I do not see the need or valu
There's no interest/descending/rebuttal opinion to this? Should I
create a enhancement ticket? I thought that this was the medium to
first propose changes/enhancements for discussion.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM, James Hanley wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm raising the issue that there should be an op
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
> > I had an IOerror when updating an external
> > (different story of an incompatibility between sqlite and our
> > corporate virus scanner, which is already being worked on
> > by our Virus department)
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:12:10 +0200:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:09:35AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the effective bug report.
>
> Yes, it is very good indeed.
>
> > I'm not able to look further into this right now but I hope someone
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:09:35AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the effective bug report.
Yes, it is very good indeed.
> I'm not able to look further into this right now but I hope someone else will.
Stefan, could you please file an issue for this? Someone will
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:49 PM, sdevinen wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am new to SVN Administration. I am trying to setup access restriction
> per
> repository.
> for cm_qa repo, i need svn-eng-rw group to have read/write access,
> svn-eng-readonly to have readonly access, and no access to anyone out
> -Original Message-
> From: sdevinen [mailto:sriharsha.w...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 08 May 2012 19:50
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: SVN+LDAP+APache Access issue.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am new to SVN Administration. I am trying to setup access
> restriction per
> repository.
> f
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the effective bug report. I'm not
able to look further into this right now but I hope someone else will.
Daniel
Stefan Podskubka wrote on Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:20:59 +0200:
> Hello,
>
>> So maybe it is related to the server version and the communication
>> p
Hello,
So maybe it is related to the server version and the communication
protocol.
I have made Wireshark captures for the failed and for the successful
communication.
If anyone is interested in those captures please say so, I didn't want
to send them directly to the list.
Anyway, if the bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
