There's no interest/descending/rebuttal opinion to this? Should I create a enhancement ticket? I thought that this was the medium to first propose changes/enhancements for discussion.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM, James Hanley <jhan...@dgtlrift.com> wrote: > All, > > I'm raising the issue that there should be an option to include merge > information of an "ls -v" in much the same way that "svn blame" > supports it. Although, I can easily use "svn blame -g" to find out who > /originally/ added a file, it's not intuitive, the more natural method > (IMHO) is to use "svn ls -v -g" to give the info on who originally > added/modified a file, not necessarily the last to merge the new file. > > Essentially, I'm looking for merge history blame on a path structure > in the same way that I can get merge history blame on an individual > file contents. > > -Jim
