Re: Picking up wrong libraries/dependencies

2012-03-29 Thread David Weintraub
I believe there's a utility called libtool that allows you to set the libpath for the machine. (I don't have my Linux box in front of me. Drats!). I had a similar situation, and I solved it by changing a file under my /etc directory to reflect the correct loading. You can also set $LIBPATH. On We

Re: Do all SVN clients run with all SVN servers?

2012-03-29 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 20:33:44 -0400: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:53:05 -0400: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Mark Phippard > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:35

Re: Do all SVN clients run with all SVN servers?

2012-03-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:53:05 -0400: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Mark Phippard > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Ben Stover > wrote: > > > > As I can see there are a couple of different

Re: Feature request: inhibit checkout of tags/branches

2012-03-29 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM, coolie wrote: > May have given the wrong impression here - its not access control but just > limiting the depth of checkout to folders matching the list. Keep in mind that the branches/tags layout in subversion is just a convention - to subversion itself, they ar

Re: Feature request: inhibit checkout of tags/branches

2012-03-29 Thread coolie
May have given the wrong impression here - its not access control but just limiting the depth of checkout to folders matching the list. On Thursday, 29 March 2012 12:49:57 UTC+1, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Paul Coulson wrote: > >> I have a legacy repo structure

Re: Feature request: inhibit checkout of tags/branches

2012-03-29 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Paul Coulson wrote: > I have a legacy repo structure that has many projects with their own tags > and branches folders. > > Users check out the whole structure as there are common lib references etc, > but they don't need to see the full contents > of tags or branc

Re: random order due to APR hash change (was: random sort of svn status and svn diff)

2012-03-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-03-29 10:07:02 -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > There is an issue filed for this: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4134 Thanks. I've updated the Debian bug information. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:

Re: Feature request: inhibit checkout of tags/branches

2012-03-29 Thread Doug Hunley
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:49, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Paul Coulson wrote: >> >> I have a legacy repo structure that has many projects with their own tags >> and branches folders. >> >> Users check out the whole structure as there are common lib references >> e

Re: random order due to APR hash change (was: random sort of svn status and svn diff)

2012-03-29 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> That's the result of a change in the APR hash table implementation. >> Subversion often uses "hash order" and in the past this was always the >> same for a given set of hash keys.  The new APR implementation means >> that this order is n

random order due to APR hash change (was: random sort of svn status and svn diff)

2012-03-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-03-21 00:51:53 +, Philip Martin wrote: > Sérgio Basto writes: > > > On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 19:23 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 20, 2012, at 19:17, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, I am facing a problem > >> > I do a svn diff | lsdiff > >> > I got file in random order ,

Re: Do all SVN clients run with all SVN servers?

2012-03-29 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:53:05 -0400: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Ben Stover wrote: > > > As I can see there are a couple of different SVN servers and mutiple SVN > > clients. > > > > > > Do all SVN clie

Re: Do all SVN clients run with all SVN servers?

2012-03-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Ben Stover wrote: > > As I can see there are a couple of different SVN servers and mutiple SVN > clients. > > > > Do all SVN clients work with all SVN servers? > > Or are some clients tied to the usage of so

Re: Merge bug -- svn:keywords and conflict resolution

2012-03-29 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stephen Butler wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:35:27 +0200: > > > On Mar 29, 2012, at 1:24 , Varnau, Steve (Seaquest R&D) wrote: > > > I did not get any responses on this bug report, neither confirming nor > > denying. > > We're an open community, as you know. If something is neither confirm

Re: Feature request: inhibit checkout of tags/branches

2012-03-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Paul Coulson wrote: > I have a legacy repo structure that has many projects with their own tags > and branches folders. > > Users check out the whole structure as there are common lib references > etc, but they don't need to see the full contents > of tags or bran

Feature request: inhibit checkout of tags/branches

2012-03-29 Thread Paul Coulson
I have a legacy repo structure that has many projects with their own tags and branches folders. Users check out the whole structure as there are common lib references etc, but they don't need to see the full contents of tags or branches folders, which can be massive. I would like a property svn:i

Re: Do all SVN clients run with all SVN servers?

2012-03-29 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Ben Stover wrote: > As I can see there are a couple of different SVN servers and mutiple SVN > clients. > > Do all SVN clients work with all SVN servers? > Or are some clients tied to the usage of some special SVN servers? All client and servers should be interop

Re: Parallel branches/tags/trunk directories

2012-03-29 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:33 AM, coolie wrote: > > I have exactly the same issue - I want to inhibit checkout of all tags (and > branches) folders, but still be able to do an update from the root. I've > read the replies on this post and none seem to solve the problem. Did you > find a simple solu

Do all SVN clients run with all SVN servers?

2012-03-29 Thread Ben Stover
As I can see there are a couple of different SVN servers and mutiple SVN clients. Do all SVN clients work with all SVN servers? Or are some clients tied to the usage of some special SVN servers? Ben

Feature request: inhibiting checkout for tags and branches

2012-03-29 Thread coolie
I have an inherited repo structure that has many projects with their own tags and branches folders. Users check out the whole structure as there are common lib references etc, but don't need to see the full contents of tags or branches folders, which can be massive. I would like a property svn:i

Re: Parallel branches/tags/trunk directories

2012-03-29 Thread coolie
I have exactly the same issue - I want to inhibit checkout of all tags (and branches) folders, but still be able to do an update from the root. I've read the replies on this post and none seem to solve the problem. Did you find a simple solution? Ideally this should be a property set on the roo

Re: Merge bug -- svn:keywords and conflict resolution

2012-03-29 Thread Stephen Butler
On Mar 29, 2012, at 1:24 , Varnau, Steve (Seaquest R&D) wrote: > I did not get any responses on this bug report, neither confirming nor > denying. We're an open community, as you know. If something is neither confirmed nor denied, then nothing happened. :-) > So I guess the next step is to f

AW: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-29 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Martin, > Von: Philip Martin > Johan Corveleyn writes: > > [Missing or broken pristines] > > Is this a situation from which svn could ultimately become self-healing? > > I suppose it might get fixed as a side-effect of somebody implementing > "optional pristine" but generally wq items are no