Hi, Martin, > Von: Philip Martin > Johan Corveleyn <[email protected]> writes: > > [Missing or broken pristines] > > Is this a situation from which svn could ultimately become self-healing? > > I suppose it might get fixed as a side-effect of somebody implementing > "optional pristine" but generally wq items are not supposed to fail.
I'd see it the other way: Having a working "fetch missing pristines" implementation is a precondition (and not a side-effect) of things like "optional pristines" and "shared pristine storage". It is needed to return whatever working copy into the "old" self-contained state. If that functionality is not provided from the beginning, existing users will be _very_ alienated. Best regards Markus Schaber -- ___________________________ We software Automation. 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH Markus Schaber | Developer Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax +49-831-54031-50 Email: [email protected] | Web: http://www.3s-software.com CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com Download CoDeSys sample projects: http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915
