On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> We bumped the SQLite requirement to the rather recent 3.6.18 because of
> bugs/features we needed.
>
> On the other hand, the minimum Python is 2.4 and the minimum APR is 0.9.
> They are old enough to go to grade school.
Well, yes. And you
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:40:18 -0400:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:17:09 -0400:
> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Se
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:17:09 -0400:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:20:18 -0400:
>> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Daniel S
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:52:01AM -0400, David Carson wrote:
> > We could allow the existing elision code to be invoked without running
> > a merge. An option like --elide-mergeinfo could be added to the
> > 'svn mergeinfo' command for this purpose. Would this be useful?
> >
>
> Yes, I think such
1.7 includes performance optimizations by Stefan2, new cache modules,
new cache users, etc.
branches/performance includes, among other things, a file handles cache
for FSFS. The plan is to merge that for 1.8.
branches/revprop-packing packs revprops into flat files (not to sqlite).
A basic form c
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:00:53PM -0400, David Carson wrote:
> > OK, so let's try again. I've merged a change from another branch, which
> is
> > a commit with a single file changed. The result is much better, but let
> me
> > verify tha
I'm using 1.6.x. I wasn't aware that there'd been sufficient
server-side work in 1.7.x as to make this distinction important.
// ben
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> You haven't mentioned what version of svn you use. As you say, there
> has been work recently --- some of it
You haven't mentioned what version of svn you use. As you say, there
has been work recently --- some of it is in 1.7, some of it is on
^/subversion/branches/performance, some of it is on
^/subversion/branches/revprop-packing, and some additional ideas
are in notes/fsfs-improvements.txt in trunk.
I've made the observation that FSFS repositories perform better on
EXT4 than BTRFS. This probably isn't ground-breaking, but I thought
I'd share it.
I've got two Linux machines:
- colossus, using BTRFS spanned over two disks.
2.6.38-11-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 19:02:55 UTC 2011
x86_6
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:17:09 -0400:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:20:18 -0400:
> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Felipe Alvarez wrote on Mon, Sep 1
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:20:18 -0400:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Felipe Alvarez wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:31:22 +1000:
>> >> Client: windows 7 x86_64 TortoiseSVN 1.5.9 (
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:20:18 -0400:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Felipe Alvarez wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:31:22 +1000:
> >> Client: windows 7 x86_64 TortoiseSVN 1.5.9 (this version is REQUIRED!)
> >> Server: Redhat 4 svn version
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Felipe Alvarez wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:31:22 +1000:
>> Client: windows 7 x86_64 TortoiseSVN 1.5.9 (this version is REQUIRED!)
>> Server: Redhat 4 svn version 1.4.4 ( r25188 ) (this version is REQUIRED!)
>>
>
> These versions are anci
Felipe Alvarez wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:31:22 +1000:
> Client: windows 7 x86_64 TortoiseSVN 1.5.9 (this version is REQUIRED!)
> Server: Redhat 4 svn version 1.4.4 ( r25188 ) (this version is REQUIRED!)
>
These versions are ancient, unsupported, and contain known security holes.
> Error L
On Thursday 08 September 2011, Tom Hale wrote:
> I'm having a strange issue in working with Aptana IDE and the SVN Plugin:
First thing: Can you reproduce the problem using just the commandline SVN
client? The point is not everybody here knows the Aptana IDE. Also, a common
cause for broken inter
15 matches
Mail list logo
