On 11/16/10 8:29 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
This is definitely off topic, but it's not RHEL4 or RHEL5 that's
unstable.
It's the engineering tools, if you run them on whichever is the latest
version of RHEL. Because the developers who produce the tools don't
have
access to the latest OS u
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> > This is definitely off topic, but it's not RHEL4 or RHEL5 that's
unstable.
> > It's the engineering tools, if you run them on whichever is the latest
> > version of RHEL. Because the developers who produce the tools don't
> have
> > access
I was able to use yum install to get the module on Fedora 14
yum install mod_dav_svn.so
Thanks for all the input.
Ravi
--- On Mon, 11/15/10, Andy Levy wrote:
From: Andy Levy
Subject: Re: Getting mod_dav_svn binary
To: "Ravi Rajamiyer"
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Date: Monday, November
On 11/16/2010 11:23 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
Hi
With some trepidation ;-) I would like to ask for opinions, somewhat related to
this thread.
My understanding is that RHEL is intended for servers that must be rock solid
e.g. Web servers. In our organisation we run Centos 5 (essentially the sa
Hi
With some trepidation ;-) I would like to ask for opinions, somewhat related to
this thread.
My understanding is that RHEL is intended for servers that must be rock solid
e.g. Web servers. In our organisation we run Centos 5 (essentially the same as
RHEL 5) on all our Linux development mac
On 11/16/2010 7:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Do we really need to continually rehash the discussion of why anyone would
ever use RHEL4???
No, but we needed to hash it enough to establish that your 'unstable'
comment about RHEL5 had to do with quirks of your environment or
choices, not tha
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The new format is as follows: '[-rN] u...@m] PATH'
> The old format was: 'PATH [-rN] URL'
>
> The real difference between the old and new formats is that the URL cannot
> have a peg revision in the old format (support for p
On 11/16/2010 3:52 AM, Neson Maxmelbin (RBEI/EMT5) wrote:
Hello .
I want to setup a reliable development process for SVN in our environment.
Here is what I am planning to propose for the process.
Each project in the repository will have the following folders -
-branches
-tags
-trunk
The initial
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 16. November 2010 schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the advantage of using
> > >
> > > ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40
> > what is the advantage of using
> >
> > ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
>
> This new format does support relative URLs.
Are there many files beginning with a caret?
If not, it would also be convenient for:
* svn list
* svn cat
* svn copy
* svn move
* svn diff
* ...
Basically
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the advantage of using
>
> ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
This new format does support relative URLs.
> compared to
>
> -r 40 ^/trunk/project/subproject subproject
This old format doesn'
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> > This has already been mentioned in this thread. I can't speak for
> > anyone else, but I personally support engineers and engineering tools.
> > The engineering tools are only supported on the latest 2 versions of
> > RHEL/centos. Of whic
Hi,
what is the advantage of using
^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
compared to
-r 40 ^/trunk/project/subproject subproject
?
Is it the case that the first version works if ^/trunk/project/subproject is
deleted in a later revision and the second version fails?
Christoph
Hello .
I want to setup a reliable development process for SVN in our environment.
Here is what I am planning to propose for the process.
Each project in the repository will have the following folders -
-branches
-tags
-trunk
The initial baseline of the project will be in trunk folder.
For th
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 16. November 2010 12:36 PM
To: David Weintraub; Neson Maxmelbin (RBEI/EMT5)
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: SVN Migration from VSS
> -Original Message-
> From: David Weintraub [mailt
15 matches
Mail list logo
