Well, we are using AD and when the user is in a group and I autorized the
group it's the description of the group I receive and not the one of the
user. Not very useful.
Leszek Szarlej wrote:
>
> Can you give more details? where did you get the group description ?
>
>
> On 2 July 2010 20:
Can you give more details? where did you get the group description ?
On 2 July 2010 20:47, Jean-Francois Trepanier wrote:
> I did a test and it worked... except that I received the description of the
> group and not the user Not great...
>
> max...@hotmail.com
>
>
>
> --
I did a test and it worked... except that I received the description of the
group and not the user Not great...
max...@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:35:31 +0200
Subject: Re: Subversion with LDAP - Display description
From: leszek.szar...@gmail.com
To: alec.kl...@oracle.com
CC:
Hi
In our company we authenticate based on UserID, then we use email address
for authz authentication.
AuthLDAPURL "ldap://bla.glob.com:389/(..)?UserID,mail?sub?(objectClass=*)"
AuthzForceUsernameCase Lower
AuthLDAPRemoteUserAttribute mail
AuthLDAPRemoteUserIsDN on
AuthzLDAPAuthoritative o
On 2010-07-02 08:13, Maxter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>We did all necessary for the deployment of LDAP with Apache/Subversion
> but I found a little thing that arrass me a little bit. When we do commit,
> the user displayed is the username in the AD. The problem is that the
> username is a sequetial nu
Hi,
We did all necessary for the deployment of LDAP with Apache/Subversion
but I found a little thing that arrass me a little bit. When we do commit,
the user displayed is the username in the AD. The problem is that the
username is a sequetial number so not really userful for knowing fast who
Cooke, Mark siemens.com> writes:
> A few more details are probably required before we can help... What are you
trying to connect to?
protocol : svn
ssh : no
network issues : no , works on other pc on same network and svn commit works ,
its svn update and svn checkout that fail.
Platform wi
> -Original Message-
> From: ddeconin [mailto:ddeco...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 July 2010 13:24
> Subject: Re: svn fails to checkout
>
> svn update d:\localpath\trunk\Documentation
>
> from cmd prompt the command just hangs, doing nothing.
> this directory has only a few files in it.
>
A
svn update d:\localpath\trunk\Documentation
from cmd prompt the command just hangs, doing nothing.
this directory has only a few files in it.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 23:11 -0400:
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM, west alto wrote:
>> > Thanks guys, Ho do i upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6? Do i need to install
>> > first 1.4 then do a svn dump and load, then 1.5 and t
Sorry, page link has changed:
http://ymartin59.free.fr/wordpress/index.php/projets/tune-subversion-fsfs-repository/
Comments and feedback are welcome
- "Yves Martin" a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> For an upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6, I have simply apply "svnadmin upgrade"
> command
> and check integri
Hello,
How can I detect if some file is not present in current repository,
because it is out of scope of shallow checkout?
Please CC. Thanks.
--
anatoly t.
Hello,
For an upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6, I have simply apply "svnadmin upgrade" command
and check integrity with "svnadmin verify".
Then, the repository is still in "linear" mode - which is not an issue, it
works.
But for performance reason, it is better to move to "sharded" mode.
To do so, I h
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 17:18 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 08:06 -0400:
> >> Second: throw HTTPS based access the heck out.
> >
> > Isn't this irrelevant to the OP's question?
>
> Nope. He's u
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 23:11 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM, west alto wrote:
> > Thanks guys, Ho do i upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6? Do i need to install
> > first 1.4 then do a svn dump and load, then 1.5 and then svn dump and
> > load etc.
>
> No, move aside the
On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Jan Lund wrote:
> I would like to know if there are any recommendations as to enforce a team
> to always branch from the latest revision of a branch. There's a big risk
> that a developer might have forgotten to update a branch, then does a
> replace (in TortoiseSVN) whic
16 matches
Mail list logo
