Re: svn support for symbolic link?

svn handles symlinks by having a special file attribute for “this is a symlink” and the contents in its repository are just the directory to point the symlink at. This works well for simple cases, although I’ve found replacing symlinks with real files can cause some confusion if you’re not careful

Re: Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

For me the key differences between git and svn come down to development model. In general, they can both be made to do the same things and which is easier to “bend to your will" comes down to how you prefer to work. If you have a defined group of people working on a project, and want to have a sin

Re: Using * in AuthzSVNAccessFile file

You can’t put in arbitrary wildcards, but you don’t have to specify a repository. If you use one project per repository (which I highly recommend), then you can just define [/trunk/passwords] *= or similar to set up permissions for the same path in all projects. — Sarah Codesion.com On 21 M

Re: Automatic commission?

Don't forget to Reply All so this discussion stays on the mailing list. On May 24, 2010, at 17:57, Peng Yu wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On May 24, 2010, at 17:03, Peng Yu wrote: >>> I might change filenames or even move files around several times >>> before I 'c

Re: Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

Mon, 24 May 2010 17:49:22 -0400, /David Weintraub/: Many people think that Git MUST be better because Linus Tolvards uses it. But, that's mainly because of the way the Linux project operates. I've had developers tell me how much better Git is when they work with on their own one-man projects

Re: Automatic commission?

On May 24, 2010, at 17:03, Peng Yu wrote: > I might change filenames or even move files around several times > before I 'commit'. Since I need tell svn the renames and moves that I > have done, does svn keep all the intermediate changes when I finally > 'commit'. > > I think that svn should not k

Re: Automatic commission?

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, David Weintraub wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Peng Yu wrote: >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: >>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Peng Yu wrote: It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This w

Re: Automatic commission?

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Peng Yu wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Peng Yu wrote: >>> It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This >>> will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files

RE: Automatic commission?

No. You must use the SVN rename. Regards, Tom -Original Message- From: Peng Yu [mailto:pengyu...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 5:54 PM To: Daniel Becroft Cc: users Subject: Re: Automatic commission? On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 201

Re: Automatic commission?

Mon, 24 May 2010 16:40:06 -0500, /Peng Yu/: It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files before I can do a commission. Is there an automatic way to figure out which files should be commit and commit them?

Re: Automatic commission?

When you do a "svn commit", it will automatically submit any files that were changed. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Peng Yu wrote: > It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This > will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files before > I can do a commissi

Re: Automatic commission?

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Peng Yu wrote: >> It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This >> will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files before >> I can do a commission. Is there an automatic

Re: Automatic commission?

On 5/24/2010 4:40 PM, Peng Yu wrote: It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files before I can do a commission. Is there an automatic way to figure out which files should be commit and commit them? A commit w

Re: Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

Many people think that Git MUST be better because Linus Tolvards uses it. But, that's mainly because of the way the Linux project operates. I've had developers tell me how much better Git is when they work with on their own one-man projects because Git is "distributed". They don't realize that Git

Re: Automatic commission?

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Peng Yu wrote: > It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This > will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files before > I can do a commission. Is there an automatic way to figure out which > files should be commit and commit

Automatic commission?

It seems that I have to specify which file or files to commit. This will be a problem if I always simultaneously edit tens of files before I can do a commission. Is there an automatic way to figure out which files should be commit and commit them? -- Regards, Peng

RE: How to speed up subversion

On 5/24/2010 3:51 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: > > On May 21, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> Actually, Subversion is a bit more intelligent about it, attempting to use >> modification times and sizes, before doing a byte-by-byte comparison. > > Even that can be slow if there are lots o

Re: How to speed up subversion

On 5/24/2010 3:51 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: On May 21, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: Actually, Subversion is a bit more intelligent about it, attempting to use modification times and sizes, before doing a byte-by-byte comparison. Even that can be slow if there are lots of files in

Re: How to speed up subversion

On May 21, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > Actually, Subversion is a bit more intelligent about it, attempting to use > modification times and sizes, before doing a byte-by-byte comparison. Even that can be slow if there are lots of files involved. Note that some filesystems have pa

Re: Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

Mon, 24 May 2010 23:33:12 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:02:31 -0500, /Peng Yu/: Does svn offer all the capability that gits offer in terms of branching and merging (ignoring performance issues)?

Re: Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

On 5/24/2010 3:02 PM, Peng Yu wrote: I have several projects that at most 4 to 5 people are going to work on. At any particular time, there are are at most 2 or 3 people working on a same project. It seems that git outperform svn for large scale projects. I have read a few webpages on the compar

Re: Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:02:31 -0500, /Peng Yu/: Does svn offer all the capability that gits offer in terms of branching and merging (ignoring performance issues)? : ... from the release notes for Subversion 1.5: Mer

Re: svn support for symbolic link?

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 16:10, Lars Tiefland wrote: > But: Only a Linux / Unix client will preserve symbolic links. On Windows the > link will become a normal file. Actually, it'll be a file that basically contains "you should be looking at another file, look over there". The link isn't "resolved

Re: svn support for symbolic link?

But: Only a Linux / Unix client will preserve symbolic links. On Windows the link will become a normal file. Live Long And Prosper, Lars Tiefland 2010/5/24 Brown, Michael > Yep, we use them. > MB > -- > You design it, I'll build it > e-mail: michael.l.br...@philips.com > desk: 608-288-6969 >

Choosing svn or git for small scale projects?

I have several projects that at most 4 to 5 people are going to work on. At any particular time, there are are at most 2 or 3 people working on a same project. It seems that git outperform svn for large scale projects. I have read a few webpages on the comparison between svn and git. What is clear

RE: svn support for symbolic link?

Yep, we use them. MB -- You design it, I'll build it e-mail: michael.l.br...@philips.com desk: 608-288-6969 cell: 608-206-6843 > -Original Message- > From: Peng Yu [mailto:pengyu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:25 PM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn support fo

svn support for symbolic link?

For some reason, I need to create symbolic link in my source directory. When the directory structure is changed, I have some tools to fix broken links. I'm wondering if svn support symbolic links. -- Regards, Peng

RE: Reintegrate a branch issue

A little less radical do not rely on the automated merging feature. Just specify the revision(s) that you want to merge just like you would have to do with the 1.4 client. > Thank you. I believe I will downgrade my client. It's unfortunate that > the newer versions don't have an option to

RE: help me!

Hi Andy, > venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not > directly generate Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org > the DJ Heap, Branko Čibej and Troy Simpson them Which will > lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be attached > to it? Because we own the developmen