Hi Andy, > venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not > directly generate Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org > the DJ Heap, Branko Čibej and Troy Simpson them Which will > lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be attached > to it? Because we own the development process may already > contain a local Apache, and third-party development mode > which can not DJ they just single hook into Apache, so you > can go to a lot of trouble. Wish you were able to find time > to reply to my right? Thanks very much. > If you search the mailing list this has been covered quite a lot recently. Remember that binary packages are not 'part of the package' but are greated by volunteers in their own time.
DJ suffered a failure of his build system that he no longer has the time available to fix. Further searching of the list may well lead you to the following: > I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11 > They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net > You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it. > > The reason I've not announced the release in this (users) list > is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list (where I > did announce it) to download and test it first so I know my > build environment is okey. As the web page says all test on > subversion itself is running ok., but the bindings has not been > tested. > > /David ~ mark c
