> Our company is integrating Subversion into a larger process environment,
> and there are now other kinds of artifacts identifiers associated with our
> repository which are outside of Subversion. It would be handy if there
> were a way to extend the set of keywords recognized/expanded by Subver
Our company is integrating Subversion into a larger process environment,
and there are now other kinds of artifacts identifiers associated with
our repository which are outside of Subversion. It would be handy if
there were a way to extend the set of keywords recognized/expanded by
Subversion to
My understanding is that "worker" is faster because it uses threads,
but not all modules that work with Apache are thread safe. There's a
problem with PHP because some third party libraries that PHP might use
are not thread safe. Perl before 5.6 isn't thread safe, etc. Redhat,
by default, comes wit
Thanks Les,
I know NFS itself can certainly be a bottleneck. However, we will be
devoting at least three shelves of disk on our NetApp 3070 which in our
standard RAID group size will make for about 38 data spindles and we will
have have 256 GB of read cache per head on a two head storage system.
You are correct. With and with out aliases. Sometimes my fingers just don't
listen to what my mind tells them to type.
--- On Fri, 5/7/10, Bob Archer wrote:
From: Bob Archer
Subject: RE: Trouble with authorization
To: "K F" , "MarkCooke"
Cc: "Subversion Users"
Date: Friday, May 7, 2010, 5:08
On May 7, 2010, at 12:03, Bob Archer wrote:
>> On May 7, 2010, at 10:09, Felix E. Klee wrote:
>>
>>> From a server that is not running anymore, I have a backup of the
>> Subversion database: /var/db/svn
>>
>> It would have been better to back up a dumpfile of the repository, since
>> dumpfiles
> More testing reveals that aliases are not needed. Here is what works:
>
> With Groups
I assume here you mean "with aliases"
>
> [aliases]
> dev10 = dev1
> dev20 = dev2
> dev30 = dev3
>
> [groups]
> deva = &dev10, &dev20
> devb = &dev30
>
> [/]
> @deva = rw
> @devb = r
>
> -
On 5/7/2010 10:26 AM, BD wrote:
Hi All,
I'm starting a new project to consolidate all svn repos across our
company into a single instance. Originally we looked at doing a
active-passive cluster, but after looking at the loads on the current
individual svn repos, we are thinking that an active-ac
> On May 7, 2010, at 10:09, Felix E. Klee wrote:
>
> > From a server that is not running anymore, I have a backup of the
> Subversion database: /var/db/svn
>
> It would have been better to back up a dumpfile of the repository, since
> dumpfiles are portable.
>
>
> > Now I want to check out the
On May 7, 2010, at 10:09, Felix E. Klee wrote:
> From a server that is not running anymore, I have a backup of the Subversion
> database: /var/db/svn
It would have been better to back up a dumpfile of the repository, since
dumpfiles are portable.
> Now I want to check out the latest version
Thanks for the reply Ryan,
I'll have to look further into how locking is setup on our NetApp FAS 3070.
We were also considering using GFS to handle the locking, have you heard
anything about users having multiple svn compute nodes connecting to a repo
on GFS and using distributed lock manager?
I
>From a server that is not running anymore, I have a backup of the Subversion
database: /var/db/svn
Now I want to check out the latest version of every repository in that
database. What's the best way to proceed?
> > From: K F [mailto:cmkfo...@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: 05 May 2010 20:43
> >
> > The
repo in on a Unix box located at svnrepo/sandbox
> > accessing
via tortoise on a windows machine with the latest
> >
releases. When I try to do a commit as user dev1, psswd dev1,
>
> I get the following erro
On May 7, 2010, at 10:26, BD wrote:
> I'm starting a new project to consolidate all svn repos across our company
> into a single instance. Originally we looked at doing a active-passive
> cluster, but after looking at the loads on the current individual svn repos,
> we are thinking that an act
> > From: K F [mailto:cmkfo...@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: 05 May 2010 20:43
> >
> > The
repo in on a Unix box located at svnrepo/sandbox
> > accessing
via tortoise on a windows machine with the latest
> >
releases. When I try to do a commit as user dev1, psswd dev1,
>
> I get the following erro
Hi All,
I'm starting a new project to consolidate all svn repos across our company
into a single instance. Originally we looked at doing a active-passive
cluster, but after looking at the loads on the current individual svn repos,
we are thinking that an active-active cluster would be preferable.
Well,
After digging a while I found that the problem was due to a transparent
proxy between my machine and the server.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:29 AM, robert mena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a CentOS 5.4 with standard subversion + webdav access. I am facing
> a problem. I can access the reposito
I am a bit confused by the use --drop-empty-revs and --renumber-revs. In my
view, --renumber-revs is useless.
Let's suppose that I have 3 directories in my repository: A committed in
revision 1, B in revision 2 and C in revision 3
If I run
svndumpfilter exclude B < dumpfile
I expect revision
Fri, 7 May 2010 07:07:41 -0700 (PDT), /tstone-barcard/:
The SVN Book uses a path syntax throughout the narrative that prefixes
a "^". I'm continually baffled by the use of "^" in the svn-book
(http://svnbook.red-bean.com) because I cannot get it to work.
What is this shortcut? When does it wo
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 07:07:41AM -0700, tstone-barcard wrote:
> The SVN Book uses a path syntax throughout the narrative that prefixes
> a "^". I'm continually baffled by the use of "^" in the svn-book
> (http://svnbook.red-bean.com) because I cannot get it to work.
>
> What is this shortcut? Wh
The SVN Book uses a path syntax throughout the narrative that prefixes
a "^". I'm continually baffled by the use of "^" in the svn-book
(http://svnbook.red-bean.com) because I cannot get it to work.
What is this shortcut? When does it work? Does it need to be set?
I've tried using it, but it neve
> > From: K F [mailto:cmkfo...@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: 05 May 2010 20:43
> >
> > The
repo in on a Unix box located at svnrepo/sandbox
> > accessing
via tortoise on a windows machine with the latest
> >
releases. When I try to do a commit as user dev1, psswd dev1,
>
> I get the following erro
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:35:16AM +0800, Jean Seurin wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > unfortunately even with a fresh branch check out, it would not pick
> > up the missing changes, that is the problem.
>
> Can you try to find out w
[ Taking this discussion back from dev@ to users@ ]
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:15:25PM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> it sounds
> as though creating branches from mixed-revision working copies will
> cause problems with merging.
The implications of mixed-revision working copies on tree conflicts
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:35:16AM +0800, Jean Seurin wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> unfortunately even with a fresh branch check out, it would not pick
> up the missing changes, that is the problem.
Can you try to find out why it would merge the remaining changes?
I don't think anyone can help you deb
Daniel Becroft wrote on Fri, 7 May 2010 at 20:48 +1000:
> Have a look into 'svnlook changed' and 'svnlook cat' commands.
Subversion 1.7 will also have an 'svnlook filesize' subcommand.
bad idea, and should be discouraged. A revision that contains
svn:mergeinfo changes should only contain the file and structure
> changes logically equivalent to the revisions that have been merged.
Sure, but back to Joël's question: that still does not mean SVN can
assume this "merge changset"
>
>
> > Thanks Olivier; but this is just abstract view; I want to compute the
> > transaction size based on some predefined value (say 5 MB) and
> allow commit
> > to the repository if transaction size (in case new file commit) is less
> than
> > or equal to this size.
> >
> > Any idea you have ?
>
Ravi Roy wrote on Fri, 7 May 2010 at 15:56 +0530:
> I want to compute the transaction size based on some predefined value
> (say 5 MB)
Most probably, you're interested in the size of something *created*
by the transaction --- not in the physical size of the on-disk
representation of the transactio
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Ravi Roy wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote:
>>
>> Ravi Roy wrote:
>>>
>>> Actual commit size is 1.28 MB and this script gives me 5528 bytes.
>>> Something wrong with script or there is compression involved or what ?
>>
>> Well, rea
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 06:26, Ravi Roy wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote:
>>
>> Ravi Roy wrote:
>>>
>>> Actual commit size is 1.28 MB and this script gives me 5528 bytes.
>>> Something wrong with script or there is compression involved or what ?
>>
>> Well, readi
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote:
> Ravi Roy wrote:
>
>> Actual commit size is 1.28 MB and this script gives me 5528 bytes.
>> Something wrong with script or there is compression involved or what ?
>>
> Well, reading the book could have told you that this is expected:
>
>
>
Ravi Roy wrote:
Actual commit size is 1.28 MB and this script gives me 5528 bytes.
Something wrong with script or there is compression involved or what ?
Well, reading the book could have told you that this is expected:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.reposadmin.maint.html#svn.repos
> >> Can somebody throw some light on this please?
>
> This question is both confused and confusing. You'll have more success
> if you use established subversion terminology correctly and avoid
> making up your own terminology without defining it.
>
> (I know it's a bit of a chicken-and-the-egg pr
Hi!
Is there somewhere a generic linux binary distribution of subversion? One that
just needs to be unpacked and needs no root privileges on a debian system.
Thanks for reading!
iarpad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Giulio
> When you use the update command you simply bring down the changes done
> into that directory. If you specify a revision you bring down the changes
> upt to that revision.
Thanks. I think that is the crucial point, that the update works on the
directory in question. Tags had no change
>
Linedata Services (UK) Ltd
Registered Office: Bishopsgate Court, 4-12 Norton Folgate, London, E1 6DB
Registered in England and Wales No 3027851VAT Reg No 778499447
-Original Message-
> From: David Aldrich [mailto:david.aldr...@eu.nec.com]
> Sent: 07 May 2010 10:15
> To: users@sub
Hi
One of our users asked me a question this morning that revealed that I don't
fully understand revision numbering in svn. So I would like to ask for
explanation please.
With the trunk at revision n, he created a tag using svn copy -r HEAD. So I
guess the tag was at then at revision n+1.
H
>
Linedata Services (UK) Ltd
Registered Office: Bishopsgate Court, 4-12 Norton Folgate, London, E1 6DB
Registered in England and Wales No 3027851VAT Reg No 778499447
-Original Message-
> From: alibeck [mailto:alexander.beck-rat...@aei.mpg.de]
> Sent: 07 May 2010 08:14
> To: users@s
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 06:48, Ravi Roy wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Ravi Roy wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> General question about Transaction size versus actual file commit size. I
>> am getting strange results when I am trying to commit 1.28 file and
>> transaction size I am getting is 553
Hello list,
how can I obtain a version information about an installed subversion
client and server?
Cheers
Alexander
41 matches
Mail list logo
